Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reconciling food security and biodiversity conservation: participatory scenario planning in southwestern Ethiopia
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 82020 (English)In: Ecology and Society, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 25, no 3, article id 24Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Social-ecological systems are complex and involve uncertainties emerging from interactions between biophysical and social system components. In the face of growing complexity and uncertainty, stakeholder engagement with the future is important to proactively manoeuvre toward desirable outcomes. Focusing on the interrelated challenges of food security and biodiversity conservation, we conducted a participatory scenario planning exercise in a rural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. We involved 35 stakeholder organizations in multiple workshops to construct causal loop diagrams, elicit critical uncertainties, and draft scenario narratives. Jointly, we developed four plausible future scenarios for the studied landscape: (1) gain over grain: local cash crops; (2) mining green gold: coffee investors; (3) coffee and conservation: a biosphere reserve; and (4) food first: intensive farming and forest protection. These scenarios differ with respect to their main social-economic dynamics as well as their food security and biodiversity outcomes. Importantly, three of the four scenarios, i.e., all except coffee and conservation: a biosphere reserve, focused on increasing efficiency in agricultural production through intensification, specialization, and market integration. In contrast, coffee and conservation: a biosphere reserve was driven by agroecological production methods that support diversified livelihoods, a multifunctional landscape, maintenance of natural capital, a governance system that supports local people, and social-ecological resilience. Similar agroecological trajectories have been advocated as desirable for sustainable development in numerous other smallholder farming systems worldwide. Given fewer trade-offs and better equity outcomes, it appears that an agroecological development pathway stands a good chance of generating synergies between food security and biodiversity conservation. Pathways prioritizing agricultural efficiency, in contrast, are more likely to degrade natural capital and cause social inequity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 25, no 3, article id 24
Keywords [en]
agroecology, drivers of change, future scenarios, intensification, rural landscapes, social-ecological system, stakeholder participation
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-187839DOI: 10.5751/ES-11681-250324ISI: 000575578700013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-187839DiVA, id: diva2:1510566
Available from: 2020-12-16 Created: 2020-12-16 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Hylander, Kristoffer

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hylander, Kristoffer
By organisation
Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences
In the same journal
Ecology and Society
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf