Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of back-mounted biologgers on condition, diving and flight performance in a breeding seabird
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Stockholm Resilience Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9479-7609
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52020 (English)In: Journal of Avian Biology, ISSN 0908-8857, E-ISSN 1600-048X, Vol. 51, no 11, article id e02509Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Biologging devices are providing detailed insights into the behaviour and movement of animals in their natural environments. It is usually assumed that this method of gathering data does not impact on the behaviour observed. However, potential negative effects on birds have rarely been investigated before field-based studies are initiated. Seabirds which both fly and use pursuit diving may be particularly sensitive to increases in drag and load resulting from carrying biologging devices. We studied chick-rearing adult common guillemots Uria aalge equipped with and without back-mounted GPS tags over short deployments of a few days. Concurrently guillemots carried small leg-mounted TDR devices (time-depth recorders) providing activity data throughout. Changes in body mass and breeding success were followed for device equipped and control guillemots. At the colony level guillemots lost body mass throughout the chick-rearing period. When-equipped with the additional GPS tag, the guillemots lost mass at close to twice the rate they did when equipped with only the smaller leg-mounted TDR device. The elevated mass loss suggests an impact on energy expenditure or foraging performance. When equipped with GPS tags diving performance, time-activity budgets and daily patterns of activity were unchanged, yet dive depth distributions differed. We review studies of tag-effects in guillemots Uria sp. finding elevated mass loss and reduced chick-provisioning to be the most commonly observed effects. Less information is available for behavioural measures, and results vary between studies. In general, small tags deployed over several days appear to have small or no measurable effect on the behavioural variables commonly observed in most guillemot tagging studies. However, there may still be impacts on fitness via physiological effects and/or reduced chick-provisioning, while more detailed measures of behaviour (e.g. using accelerometery) may reveal effects on diving and flight performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 51, no 11, article id e02509
Keywords [en]
animal welfare, biologging, device effects, diving, foraging, Uria aalge
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-188882DOI: 10.1111/jav.02509ISI: 000595749100003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-188882DiVA, id: diva2:1517916
Available from: 2021-01-14 Created: 2021-01-14 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Olsson, OlofÅkesson, Susanne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olsson, OlofÅkesson, Susanne
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Journal of Avian Biology
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf