Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Not Next to You: Peer Rejection, Student Characteristics and the Moderating Effects of Classroom Composition
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8036-2997
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI). ROCKWOOL Foundation, Denmark .ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0544-9977
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI). Institute for Futures Studies, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7994-4829
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Although sociodemographic characteristics such as immigrant background and low socioeconomic status have been found to increase the risk for peer rejection, it remains unclear whether rejection in school settings primarily occurs between different-characteristic peers or is also driven by same-characteristic peers, nor whether these types of processes are moderated by classroom composition. Building on person-group dissimilarity theories, we address this gap in the literature using a large sample of 4,215 Swedish students (aged 14-15) in 201 eighth grade classes. Sociometric data provide information on received rejection nominations and rejection networks in school classes. Five characteristics are examined at the student- and classroom-levels: gender, immigration background, household income, parental education, and cognitive ability. Information on sociodemographic characteristics is drawn from linked survey and administrative population registers. A two-pronged empirical strategy is used, using both multilevel random effects models and Exponential Random Graph Models. We find that multiple characteristics are associated with peer rejection, and classroom composition moderates how these characteristics are associated with the extent to which students are rejected and reject classmates who are different to themselves. 

Keywords [en]
adolescents, classroom composition, peer rejection, negative ties, sociodemographic, SES, ERGM, multilevel models
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189654OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-189654DiVA, id: diva2:1523578
Available from: 2021-01-28 Created: 2021-01-28 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Taking Part on Equal Terms?: Associations between Economic Resources and Social Participation among Swedish Adolescents
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Taking Part on Equal Terms?: Associations between Economic Resources and Social Participation among Swedish Adolescents
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation contains four empirical studies examining associations between economic resources and social participation among Swedish adolescents. All four studies draw data from a school-based survey covering a nationally representative sample of the 2010 cohort of Swedish eighth-grade students.

Study I examines associations between economic resources and school class friendships. A child-centred perspective on economic resources is used, combining self-reported measures of adolescents' own access to economic resources with disposable household income measured relative to other students in the same school. Friendships are assessed through sociometric data – students nominate their best friends in the school class. Results show that students with the lowest within-school household incomes and students who report to often miss out on activities due to a lack of economic resources receive on average fewer friendship nominations and are more likely to experience social isolation.

Study II considers associations between economic resources (own economic resources and relative household income) and adverse relationships with school class peers. Two forms of adverse relationships are assessed: the risk of bullying victimisation (self-reported) and peer rejection (measured through sociometric nominations). Students with the lowest within-school household incomes receive, on average, more rejection nominations but are not at higher risk of bullying victimisation. In contrast, students who often miss out on activities with peers due to a lack of economic resources both receive more rejection nominations and are at higher risk of bullying victimisation.

Study III extends the examination of peer rejection, assessing whether students who differ from classmates on some sociodemographic characteristic are more likely to experience peer rejection. Results show an association between household income and peer rejection, but the association is largely similar across classrooms of varying income levels. Moreover, the likelihood of a student to reject a specific classmate is unaffected by differences in household income. In addition, the study examines corresponding associations between peer rejection and other sociodemographic characteristics: immigration background, parental education, and gender.

Study IV turns the attention towards participation in extracurricular activities. Cross-country research shows that children from lower-income households are less likely to participate in such activities than are children from more affluent households. The study documents such a pattern among Swedish adolescents and examines the merits of different theoretical explanations. Panel data models are used to examine whether changes in household income are associated with changes in participation. Results show that income changes are not in general associated with changes in participation, but a weak association is found between changes in income and ceasing participation among adolescents in low-income households. Results are more consistent with theoretical explanations emphasising cultural differences and non-economic forms of resource constraints, than with explanations emphasising household economic constraints.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Sociology, Stockholm University, 2021. p. 32
Series
Swedish Institute for Social Research, ISSN 0283-8222 ; 105
Keywords
Peer relationships, Social relationships, Friendships, Peer rejection, Bullying victimization, Extracurricular activities, Organised leisure activities, Structured leisure activities, Adolescence, Youth, Childhood, School, Economic resources, Material deprivation, Disposable household income, Child poverty, Sociometric data, Network data
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189779 (URN)978-91-7911-398-8 (ISBN)978-91-7911-399-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-03-18, sal B 800, Universitetsvägen 10 B, digitally via video conference (Zoom), public link shared at www.sociology.su.se in connection with nailing of the thesis, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-02-23 Created: 2021-02-01 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Hjalmarsson, SimonFallesen, PeterPlenty, Stephanie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hjalmarsson, SimonFallesen, PeterPlenty, Stephanie
By organisation
The Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI)
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 436 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf