Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Population genomics reveals lack of greater white-fronted introgression into the Swedish lesser white-fronted goose
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 82020 (English)In: Scientific Reports, E-ISSN 2045-2322, Vol. 10, no 1, article id 18347Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Interspecific introgression is considered a potential threat to endangered taxa. One example where this has had a major impact on conservation policy is the lesser white-fronted goose (LWfG). After a dramatic decline in Sweden, captive breeding birds were released between 1981-1999 with the aim to reinforce the population. However, the detection of greater white-fronted goose (GWfG) mitochondrial DNA in the LWfG breeding stock led to the release program being dismantled, even though the presence of GWfG introgression in the actual wild Swedish LWfG population was never documented. To examine this, we sequenced the complete genomes of 21 LWfG birds from the Swedish, Russian and Norwegian populations, and compared these with genomes from other goose species, including the GWfG. We found no evidence of interspecific introgression into the wild Swedish LWfG population in either nuclear genomic or mitochondrial data. Moreover, Swedish LWfG birds are genetically distinct from the Russian and Norwegian populations and display comparatively low genomic diversity and high levels of inbreeding. Our findings highlight the utility of genomic approaches in providing scientific evidence that can help improve conservation management as well as policies for breeding and reinforcement programmes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 10, no 1, article id 18347
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-191266DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75315-yISI: 000615371700007PubMedID: 33110153OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-191266DiVA, id: diva2:1538315
Available from: 2021-03-18 Created: 2021-03-18 Last updated: 2022-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Díez-del-Molino, Davidvon Seth, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Díez-del-Molino, Davidvon Seth, Johanna
By organisation
Department of Zoology
In the same journal
Scientific Reports
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf