Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Educational Transitions and Educational Inequality: A Multiple Pathways Sequential Logit Model Analysis of Finnish Birth Cohorts 1960-1985
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. European University Institute, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9687-1932
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland.
Number of Authors: 22020 (English)In: European Sociological Review, ISSN 0266-7215, E-ISSN 1468-2672, Vol. 36, no 5, p. 700-719Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We developed a multiple pathways sequential logit model for analysing social background inequality in completed education and applied it to analyse educational inequality in Finland (birth cohorts 1960-1985). Our model builds on the sequential logit model for educational transitions, originally presented by Robert D. Mare and later extended by Maarten Buis, which disaggregates inequality in completed education into the weighted sum of inequalities in the transitions leading to it. Although the educational transitions framework is popular among educational stratification researchers, its applications have almost exclusively focused on analysing inequalities in separate educational transitions. Buis presented a unifying model of inequalities in educational transitions and completed education, which gives a substantive interpretation to the weights that link them. We applied this to an educational system in which the same educational outcomes can be reached through multiple pathways. Our analysis of Finnish register data shows that intergenerational educational persistence increased, particularly among women. The main reasons are increased inequality in academic upper-secondary (gymnasium) completion and gymnasium expansion that increased the weight of this transition as well as of the transition to university. We discuss the integration of structural and allocative mechanisms in educational stratification research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 36, no 5, p. 700-719
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-191658DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcaa019ISI: 000607081700003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-191658DiVA, id: diva2:1540800
Available from: 2021-03-30 Created: 2021-03-30 Last updated: 2022-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Härkönen, JuhoSirniö, Outi

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Härkönen, JuhoSirniö, Outi
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
European Sociological Review
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf