Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does the food processing contaminant acrylamide cause developmental neurotoxicity? A review and identification of knowledge gaps
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1779-4957
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 132021 (English)In: Reproductive Toxicology, ISSN 0890-6238, E-ISSN 1873-1708, Vol. 101, p. 93-114Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is a worldwide concern on adverse health effects of dietary exposure to acrylamide (AA) due to its presence in commonly consumed foods. AA is formed when carbohydrate rich foods containing asparagine and reducing sugars are prepared at high temperatures and low moisture conditions. Upon oral intake, AA is rapidly absorbed and distributed to all organs. AA is a known human neurotoxicant that can reach the developing foetus via placental transfer and breast milk. Although adverse neurodevelopmental effects have been observed after prenatal AA exposure in rodents, adverse effects of AA on the developing brain has so far not been studied in humans. However, epidemiological studies indicate that gestational exposure to AA impair foetal growth and AA exposure has been associated with reduced head circumference of the neonate. Thus, there is an urgent need for further research to elucidate whether pre- and perinatal AA exposure in humans might impair neurodevelopment and adversely affect neuronal function postnatally. Here, we review the literature with emphasis on the identification of critical knowledge gaps in relation to neurodevelopmental toxicity of AA and its mode of action and we suggest research strategies to close these gaps to better protect the unborn child.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 101, p. 93-114
Keywords [en]
Acrylamide, Developmental neurotoxicity, Developmental origins of health and disease, Glycidamide, Human neuronal stem cells, Neurological, Physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK), The Norwegian mother father and child cohort, (MoBa)
National Category
Pharmacology and Toxicology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-194359DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.02.006ISI: 000640326700001PubMedID: 33617935OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-194359DiVA, id: diva2:1570362
Available from: 2021-06-21 Created: 2021-06-21 Last updated: 2022-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Johansson, YlvaAndreassen, MathildaHusøy, TrineKnutsen, Helle K.Caspersen, Ida H.Paulsen, Ragnhild E.Forsby, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, YlvaAndreassen, MathildaHusøy, TrineKnutsen, Helle K.Caspersen, Ida H.Paulsen, Ragnhild E.Forsby, Anna
By organisation
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
In the same journal
Reproductive Toxicology
Pharmacology and Toxicology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 110 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf