Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Global Gridded Evapotranspiration Datasets across Iran
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. Navarino Environmental Observatory, Greece; KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7978-0040
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography. Navarino Environmental Observatory, Greece.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3709-4103
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52021 (English)In: Remote Sensing, E-ISSN 2072-4292, Vol. 13, no 9, article id 1816Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Estimating evapotranspiration (ET), the main water output flux within basins, is an important step in assessing hydrological changes and water availability. However, direct measurements of ET are challenging, especially for large regions. Global products now provide gridded estimates of ET at different temporal resolution, each with its own method of estimating ET based on various data sources. This study investigates the differences between ERA5, GLEAM, and GLDAS datasets of estimated ET at gridded points across Iran, and their accuracy in comparison with reference ET. The spatial and temporal discrepancies between datasets are identified, as well as their co-variation with forcing variables. The ET reference values used to check the accuracy of the datasets were based on the water balance (ETwb) from Iran's main basins, and co-variation of estimated errors for each product with forcing drivers of ET. The results indicate that ETERA5 provides higher base average values and lower maximum annual average values than ETGLEAM. Temporal changes at the annual scale are similar for GLEAM, ERA5, and GLDAS datasets, but differences at seasonal and monthly time scales are identified. Some discrepancies are also recorded in ET spatial distribution, but generally, all datasets provide similarities, e.g., for humid regions basins. ETERA5 has a higher correlation with available energy than available water, while ETGLEAM has higher correlation with available water, and ETGLDAS does not correlate with none of these drivers. Based on the comparison of ETERA5 and ETGLEAM with ETwb, both have similar errors in spatial distribution, while ETGLDAS provided over and under estimations in northern and southern basins, respectively, compared to them (ETERA5 and ETGLEAM). All three datasets provide better ET estimates (values closer to ETWB) in hyper-arid and arid regions from central to eastern Iran than in the humid areas. Thus, the GLEAM, ERA5, and GLDAS datasets are more suitable for estimating ET for arid rather than humid basins in Iran.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 13, no 9, article id 1816
Keywords [en]
evapotranspiration, water balance, GLEAM, ERA5, GLDAS, Iran
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-195298DOI: 10.3390/rs13091816ISI: 000650749100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-195298DiVA, id: diva2:1585493
Available from: 2021-08-17 Created: 2021-08-17 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Kalantari, ZahraSantos Ferreira, Carla Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kalantari, ZahraSantos Ferreira, Carla Sofia
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography
In the same journal
Remote Sensing
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 9 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf