Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Does the management of personal integrity information lead to differing participation rates and response patterns in mental health surveys with young adults? A three-armed methodological experiment
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Work and organizational psychology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8213-1391
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 82021 (English)In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, ISSN 1049-8931, E-ISSN 1557-0657, Vol. 30, no 4, article id e1891Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: This study evaluates whether initiation rates, completion rates, response patterns and prevalence of psychiatric conditions differ by level of personal integrity information given to prospective participants in an online mental health self-report survey.

Methods: A three-arm, parallel-group, single-blind experiment was conducted among students from two Swedish universities. Consenting participants following e-mail invitation answered the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health-International College Student (WMH-ICS) mental health self-report survey, screening for eight psychiatric conditions. Random allocation meant consenting to respond (1) anonymously; (2) confidentially, or (3) confidentially, where the respondent also gave consent for collection of register data.

Results: No evidence was found for overall between-group differences with respect to (1) pressing a hyperlink to the survey in the invitation email; and (2) abandoning the questionnaire before completion. However, participation consent and self-reported depression were in the direction of higher levels for the anonymous group compared to the two confidential groups.

Conclusions: Consent to participate is marginally affected by different levels of personal integrity information. Current standard participant information procedures may not engage participants to read the information thoroughly, and online self-report mental health surveys may reduce stigma and thus be less subject to social desirability bias.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 30, no 4, article id e1891
Keywords [en]
anonymous, confidential, mental health, online survey, personal integrity, register data
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-196828DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1891ISI: 000686927400001PubMedID: 34418224OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-196828DiVA, id: diva2:1594702
Note

This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet), grant no 2019-01127 to PI and author AHB.

The authors would like to acknowledge participating universities and students.

Available from: 2021-09-16 Created: 2021-09-16 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Andersson, ClaesLindfors, PetraMolander, OlofBerman, Anne H.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, ClaesLindfors, PetraMolander, OlofBerman, Anne H.
By organisation
Work and organizational psychology
In the same journal
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Public Health, Global Health and Social MedicinePsychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 271 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf