Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Image-based assessment of extracellular mucin-to-tumor area predicts consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) in colorectal cancer
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics. Stockholm University, Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab). Zürich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 72022 (English)In: Modern Pathology, ISSN 0893-3952, E-ISSN 1530-0285, Vol. 35, p. 240-248Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The backbone of all colorectal cancer classifications including the consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) highlights microsatellite instability (MSI) as a key molecular pathway. Although mucinous histology (generally defined as >50% extracellular mucin-to-tumor area) is a “typical” feature of MSI, it is not limited to this subgroup. Here, we investigate the association of CMS classification and mucin-to-tumor area quantified using a deep learning algorithm, and  the expression of specific mucins in predicting CMS groups and clinical outcome. A weakly supervised segmentation method was developed to quantify extracellular mucin-to-tumor area in H&E images. Performance was compared to two pathologists’ scores, then applied to two cohorts: (1) TCGA (n = 871 slides/412 patients) used for mucin-CMS group correlation and (2) Bern (n = 775 slides/517 patients) for histopathological correlations and next-generation Tissue Microarray construction. TCGA and CPTAC (n = 85 patients) were used to further validate mucin detection and CMS classification by gene and protein expression analysis for MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC5B. An excellent inter-observer agreement between pathologists’ scores and the algorithm was obtained (ICC = 0.92). In TCGA, mucinous tumors were predominantly CMS1 (25.7%), CMS3 (24.6%) and CMS4 (16.2%). Average mucin in CMS2 was 1.8%, indicating negligible amounts. RNA and protein expression of MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC5B were low-to-absent in CMS2. MUC5AC protein expression correlated with aggressive tumor features (e.g., distant metastases (p = 0.0334), BRAF mutation (p < 0.0001), mismatch repair-deficiency (p < 0.0001), and unfavorable 5-year overall survival (44% versus 65% for positive/negative staining). MUC2 expression showed the opposite trend, correlating with less lymphatic (p = 0.0096) and venous vessel invasion (p = 0.0023), no impact on survival.

The absence of mucin-expressing tumors in CMS2 provides an important phenotype-genotype correlation. Together with MSI, mucinous histology may help predict CMS classification using only histopathology and should be considered in future image classifiers of molecular subtypes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 35, p. 240-248
National Category
Cell and Molecular Biology Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-197307DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00894-8ISI: 000692071000001PubMedID: 34475526OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-197307DiVA, id: diva2:1598794
Available from: 2021-09-29 Created: 2021-09-29 Last updated: 2022-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Lundström, Oxana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundström, Oxana
By organisation
Department of Biochemistry and BiophysicsScience for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab)
In the same journal
Modern Pathology
Cell and Molecular BiologyCancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 40 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf