Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development and Validation of a Prevalence Model for Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) Among Patients First Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 52021 (English)In: Medical Science Monitor, ISSN 1234-1010, E-ISSN 1643-3750, Vol. 27, article id e932725Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: We designed this study to develop and validate a prevalence model for latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) among people initially diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Material/Methods: The study recruited 930 patients aged 318 years who were diagnosed with T2DM within the past year. Demographic information, medical history, and clinical biochemistry records were collected. Logistic regression was used to develop a regression model to distinguish LADA from T2DM. Predictors of LADA were identified in a subgroup of patients (n=632) by univariate logistic regression analysis. From this we developed a prediction model using multivariate logistic regression analysis and tested its sensitivity and specificity among the remaining patients (n=298).

Results: Among 930 recruited patients, 880 had T2DM (96.4%) and 50 had LADA (5.4%). Compared to T2DM patients, LADA patients had fewer surviving b cells and reduced insulin production. We identified age, ketosis, history of tobacco smoking, 1-hour plasma glucose (1hPG-AUC), and 2-hour C-peptide (2hCP-AUC) as the main predictive factors for LADA (P<0.05). Based on this, we developed a multivariable logistic regression model: Y=-8.249-0.035(X1)+1.755(X2)+1.008(X3)+0.321(X4)-0.126(X5), where Y is diabetes status (0=T2DM, 1=LADA), X1 is age, X2 is ketosis (1=no, 2=yes), X3 is history of tobacco smoking (1=no, 2=yes), X4 is 1hPG-AUC, and X5 is 2hCP-AUC. The model has high sensitivity (78.57%) and selectivity (67.96%).

Conclusions: This model can be applied to people newly diagnosed with T2DM. When Y 30.0472, total autoantibody screening is recommended to assess LADA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 27, article id e932725
Keywords [en]
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults, Predictive Value of Tests
National Category
Endocrinology and Diabetes
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-197667DOI: 10.12659/MSM.932725ISI: 000701800500001PubMedID: 34521804OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-197667DiVA, id: diva2:1602645
Available from: 2021-10-13 Created: 2021-10-13 Last updated: 2022-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Aging Research Center (ARC), (together with KI)
In the same journal
Medical Science Monitor
Endocrinology and Diabetes

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf