Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Governing complexity: Integrating science, governance, and law to manage accelerating in the commons
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 142021 (English)In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, ISSN 0027-8424, E-ISSN 1091-6490, Vol. 118, no 36, article id e2102798118Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The speed and uncertainty of environmental change in the Anthropocene challenge the capacity of coevolving social-ecological-technological systems (SETs) to adapt or transform to these changes. Formal government and legal structures further constrain the adaptive capacity of our SETs. However, new, selforganized forms of adaptive governance are emerging at multiple scales in natural resource-based SETs. Adaptive governance involves the private and public sectors as well as formal and informal institutions, self-organized to fill governance gaps in the traditional roles of states. While new governance forms are emerging, they are not yet doing so rapidly enough to match the pace of environmental change. Furthermore, they do not yet possess the legitimacy or capacity needed to address disparities between the winners and losers from change. These emergent forms of adaptive governance appear to be particularly effective in managing complexity. We explore governance and SETs as coevolving complex systems, focusing on legal systems to understand the potential pathways and obstacles to equitable adaptation. We explore how governments may facilitate the emergence of adaptive governance and promote legitimacy in both the process of governance despite the involvement of nonstate actors, and its adherence to democratic values of equity and justice. To manage the contextual nature of the results of change in complex systems, we propose the establishment of long-term study initiatives for the coproduction of knowledge, to accelerate learning and synergize interactions between science and governance and to foster public science and epistemic communities dedicated to navigating transitions to more just, sustainable, and resilient futures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 118, no 36, article id e2102798118
Keywords [en]
governance, complex systems, social-ecological-technological systems, law and science
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-197957DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102798118ISI: 000694705600011PubMedID: 34475210OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-197957DiVA, id: diva2:1605074
Available from: 2021-10-21 Created: 2021-10-21 Last updated: 2025-01-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Cosens, BarbaraSoininen, NikoBelinskij, AnttiBlenckner, ThorstenChaffin, Brian C.Craig, Robin KundisHeiskanen, Anna-StiinaSimilä, Jukka

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cosens, BarbaraSoininen, NikoBelinskij, AnttiBlenckner, ThorstenChaffin, Brian C.Craig, Robin KundisHeiskanen, Anna-StiinaSimilä, Jukka
By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Earth and Related Environmental SciencesPolitical Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf