Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The A Priori Thesis: A Critical Assessment
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2007 (English)In: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, ISSN 1333-1108, Vol. VII, no 19, 47-61 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recent debates about thought experiments have focused on a perceived epistemological problem: how do thought experiments manage to provide knowledge when they yield no new empirical data? A bold answer to this question is provided by James Robert Brown’s platonism, according to which a certain class of thought experiments allow a sort of intellectual perception of laws of nature, understood as relations between universals. I suggest that there are three main problems with platonism. First, it is restricted to a very small class of thought experiments; hence, it largely fails to address the general epistemological problem. Second, it is not quite clear what it is supposed to explain. Third, its explanatory value in any case seems dubious, since what the mechanisms it postulates (i) appear to raise issues more difficult than what they would explain, and (ii) would seem to obviate the very need for conducting thought experiments. I also argue that it fails to give an accurate account of Brown’s flagship example, Galileo’s thought experiment on falling bodies. In conclusion, I suggest that although platonism about thought experiments is an exciting thesis, it is at present unconvincing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. VII, no 19, 47-61 p.
Keyword [en]
thought experiments, a priori, James Robert Brown, platonism
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-10436ISI: 000255531000004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-10436DiVA: diva2:176955
Available from: 2008-01-02 Created: 2008-01-02 Last updated: 2011-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Häggqvist, Sören
By organisation
Department of Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf