Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Metalib and Google Scholar: a user study
Stockholm University.
Stockholm University.
Uppsala Institutionen för informationsvetenskap.
2007 (English)In: Online Information Review, ISSN 1468-4527, Vol. 31, no 3Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – This paper aims to understand how students experience the search tools Google Scholar and Metalib and the role of prior instruction.

Design/methodology/approach – A total of 32 undergraduate students searched academic articles for their thesis work. Searches were recorded using Morae software and were analysed along with the number of articles saved and responses to a questionnaire. All searched with both tools. Half of the students received training before searching.

Findings – Google Scholar performed better in almost all measures. Training had a positive effect on the amount and quality of articles saved. Responses to Google Scholar were more positive than to Metalib. However, the students were not overwhelmingly enthusiastic about either of the tools.

Research limitations/implications – Each Metalib implementation is to some extent unique, which limits the extent to which results can be generalised to other implementations.

Practical implications – Training is valuable for both tools. The user interface to Metalib does not conform with students’ expectations and needs further improvement. Both tools strive to be a first alternative search tool for academic literature but neither performed well enough in this study to recommend it to be used in that role in an academic library setting.

Originality/value – These tools are important to academic libraries but few user studies have been published, particularly on Google Scholar. To one’s knowledge no other user study on these tools as looked at the effects of instruction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 31, no 3
Keyword [en]
metasearch, federated search, user study
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-11228ISI: 000248348700008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-11228DiVA: diva2:177747
Available from: 2008-01-10 Created: 2008-01-10 Last updated: 2011-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Haya, GlennWidmark, Wilhelm
By organisation
Stockholm University
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf