Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Defeaters and Rising Standards of Justification
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy. Teoretisk.
2008 (English)In: Acta Analytica, Vol. 23, no 1, 45-54 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this paper is to refute the widespread view that challenging a knowledge-claim always raises the original standards of justification – a view often associated with contextualism. To that purpose the distinction between undermining and overriding defeaters will be used. Three kinds of challenges will be considered that differ in their degree of specification. In all three kinds of challenges, the rising standards of justification model fails to capture the dialectic of justification in the case of undermining defeaters. At the end, the skeptical challenge will more briefly be given a similar analysis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 23, no 1, 45-54 p.
Keyword [en]
justification, contextualism, overriding an unermining defeaters, skepticism
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-13643DOI: doi:10.1007/s12136-008-0019-zISI: 000263235200004OAI: diva2:180163
Available from: 2008-04-21 Created: 2008-04-21 Last updated: 2011-01-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Janvid, Mikael
By organisation
Department of Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 59 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link