Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative historical perspectives
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Slavic and Baltic Studies, Finnish, Dutch, and German, Slavic Languages.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4393-2639
2023 (English)In: The Cambridge handbook of historical orthography / [ed] Marco Condorelli; Hanna Rutkowska, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023, p. 163-182Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter is intended to offer assistance for the linguistic description of writing systems throughout the history of one or, especially, several languages and provide a comparative description of the different units of writing systems. The first section establishes the definitions of the concepts of grapheme, graph, allograph and suprasegmental grapheme. The application of these concepts to English and Romance languages is exemplified by three models and methods of diachronic and comparative description of writing systems: Romance scriptology, cultural history of European orthographies, and comparative graphematics of punctuation. The second section discusses biscriptality, the phenomenon of employing two or more writing systems for the same language, not rare in the history of languages from different families, and related to different aspects of society and language users. With examples mainly from Russian and other Slavic languages, biscriptality is shown to be present on several levels of written language, and various applications of biscriptality are characterized with the help of dichotomies such as synchronic vs. diachronic biscriptality, monocentric vs. pluricentric biscriptality, and societal vs. individual biscriptality.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. p. 163-182
Keywords [en]
Comparative methods, graphematics, biscriptality
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Linguistics; Slavic Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-224477DOI: 10.1017/9781108766463.008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85192903500ISBN: 9781108487313 (print)ISBN: 9781108766463 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-224477DiVA, id: diva2:1819407
Available from: 2023-12-13 Created: 2023-12-13 Last updated: 2024-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ambrosiani, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ambrosiani, Per
By organisation
Slavic Languages
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf