Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Top-down and bottom-up regulation of macroalgal communities – implications for coral reef management in Eastern Africa.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Systems Ecology.
2008 (English)Licentiate thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-15636OAI: diva2:182156
Available from: 2008-12-07 Created: 2008-12-07 Last updated: 2010-12-16Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Macroalgal community dynamics on coral reefs: Implications for management
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Macroalgal community dynamics on coral reefs: Implications for management
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Although rather inconspicuous on healthy coral reefs, macroalgae form the basis of coral food webs. Today, macroalgae are generally increasing and many reefs undergo transitions from coral to macroalgal dominance resulting from e.g. enhanced nutrient loading or increased fishing.

This thesis aims to investigate the relative importance of top-down and bottom-up regulation, and different herbivore types, on macroalgal distribution, fecundity and community composition on coral reefs. Papers I and II indicate that macroalgal abundance in a coral reef system is largely governed by top-down regulation through grazing by herbivores, while bottom-up regulation through enhanced nutrient availability rather influence algal species composition. Paper II also shows that these regulating effects are not as evident in an area with relatively strong water motion, suggesting that impacts of anthropogenic disturbance may be site-specific. Paper III shows that herbivory is an important factor influencing macroalgal growth and subsequent reproduction. Furthermore, Paper IV and V conclude that efficiency in removing macroalgal biomass is dependent on the type of dominant herbivore, where sea urchins seem to be more effective than fish. Paper IV indicates a seasonal variation in macroalgal biomass and distribution in a small geographic scale but with relatively high temporal resolution. Paper V on the other hand shows these same effects, but with a focus on geographic variation, including a large part of the East African region, as well as between year temporal variations in Kenya. Together, results from the two latter studies indicate that herbivory by fish may not be able to prevent a macroalgal bloom in a degraded system where substrate availability for algal colonization is high, but that it may still facilitate coral recovery over time. Thus, a large algal biomass may not necessarily indicate a reef beyond the possibility of recovery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, 2011. 46 p.
Macroalgae, Coral Reefs, Herbivory, Nutrients, Ecosystem change, Fish, Sea Urchins, East Africa
National Category
Biological Sciences
Research subject
Marine Ecotoxicology
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-48281 (URN)978-91-7447-200-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2011-01-28, Nordenskiöldsalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 12, Stockholm, 13:00 (English)

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Accepted. Paper 4: Manuscript. Paper 5: Manuscript.

Available from: 2011-01-03 Created: 2010-12-06 Last updated: 2013-12-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mörk, Erik
By organisation
Department of Systems Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 31 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link