Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sensation weighting in preference judgments creates a goodness-level dependent word-order effect
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
2008 (English)In: Fechner Day 2008: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics, 2008, 133-138 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Hellström (2003) found a goodness-level dependent word-order effect (WOE) for preference judgments. However, Hellström used preference scales adapted to each stimulus pair, and goodness was rated for whole stimulus pairs. Therefore, participants might not have judged preference, and statistical testing of the stimulus weights was not possible. In the present study, 211 participants indicated within-pair preferences for 25 stimulus pairs by choosing one of six written (same for all stimuli) preference expressions (e.g., "apple I like more than pear"). Within-pair presentation order was reversed for half of the participants. Participants also rated each stimulus’s goodness by choosing one of seven written expressions (e.g., "Apple I generally like"). Results replicated Hellström’s results; there was a greater weight for the left stimulus and a positive correlation between WOE and goodness level. These results strengthen the evidence that the WOE is due to differential sensation weighting rather than, for instance, semantic congruity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. 133-138 p.
Keyword [en]
preference, word-order effect, sensation weighting
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-16152OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-16152DiVA: diva2:182672
Available from: 2008-12-15 Created: 2008-12-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf