Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Ringing or colour-banding does not increase predation mortality
School of Biology, University of St. Andrews.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. Etologi. Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution.
Dept. of Zoology, University of Oxford.
School of Biology and Psychology, University of Newcastle.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (Swedish)In: Journal of Avian Biology, ISSN 0908-8857, Vol. 38, no 3, 309-316 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The use of metal and colour-rings or bands as a means of measuring survival, movements and behaviour in birds is universal and fundamental to testing ecological and evolutionary theories. The practice rests on the largely untested assumption that the rings do not affect survival. However this assumption may not hold for several reasons, for example because the ‘oddity effect’ predicts predators select prey that appear different to their neighbours in order to avoid the ‘confusion effect’. We compared the foraging behaviour and the death rates of redshanks Tringa totanus conspicuously marked with six colour rings and one metal ring each to unmarked birds in a study system, where routinely up to 50% of the total population are killed by avian predators during a winter. If avian predators selectively target and/or have a higher capture success of ringed birds then we would predict the proportion of colour-ringed birds in the population to decline through a winter. The proportion of colour-ringed birds in the population did not change over the course of three separate winters, and in one winter the ratio of marked:unmarked birds found killed by sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus was the same as the ratio of marked birds alive in the population. In the year with largest sample size, power was sufficient to detect a greater than 2.2% difference in predation rate between ringed and unringed groups. The average kill rate difference between ringed and unringed birds across the three winters was less than 1% (0.73±2.2%) suggesting that even if there were differences in predation rate that were not detected because of low statistical power they were extremely small. There were no differences in any foraging measures comparing ringed and unringed birds, suggesting that the rings did not affect the ability of birds to meet their daily energy budgets. The results showed that colour-ringed birds were not preferentially targeted or killed by avian predators, and suggest that the presence of a metal and even several large colour-rings is unlikely to affect behaviour and predation mortality even under extreme selection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 38, no 3, 309-316 p.
National Category
Ecology Ecology
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-19263DOI: doi:10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.03925.xOAI: diva2:185787
Available from: 2007-11-12 Created: 2007-11-12 Last updated: 2009-12-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lind, Johan
By organisation
Department of ZoologyCentre for the Study of Cultural Evolution
In the same journal
Journal of Avian Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 50 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link