Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of work-directed interventions on return-to-work in people on sick-leave for to common mental disorders—a systematic review
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5763-7577
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 72024 (English)In: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, ISSN 0340-0131, E-ISSN 1432-1246, Vol. 97, no 6, p. 597-619Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose To evaluate the body of evidence of the effects of work-directed interventions on return-to-work for people on sick leave due to common mental disorders (i.e., mild to moderate depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders and reactions to severe stress).

Methods The systematic review was conducted in accordance with an a priori developed and registered protocol (Prospero CRD42021235586). The certainty of evidence was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

Results We reviewed 14,794 records published between 2015 and 2021. Of these, eight RCTs published in eleven articles were included in the analysis. Population: Working age adults (18 to 64 years), on sick leave due to mild to moderate depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders or reactions to severe stress. Intervention: Work-directed interventions. Comparator: No comparator, Standard care, or other measures. Outcome: return to work, number of days on sick leave, income. Overall, the effects of work-focused CBT and work-focused team-based support on RTW resulted in increased or faster return-to-work compared with standard care or no intervention (low certainty of evidence). The effects of Individual Placement and Support showed no difference in RTW compared with standard care (very low certainty of evidence).

Conclusion Interventions involving the workplace could increase the probability of RTW. Areas in need of improvement in the included studies, for example methodological issues, are discussed. Further, suggestions are made for improving methodological rigor when conducting large scale trials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 97, no 6, p. 597-619
Keywords [en]
Systematic review, Depression, Anxiety, Adjustment disorder, Reactions to severe stress, Return-to-work
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-229271DOI: 10.1007/s00420-024-02068-wISI: 001214788000001PubMedID: 38710801Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85192158188OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-229271DiVA, id: diva2:1860128
Available from: 2024-05-23 Created: 2024-05-23 Last updated: 2024-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Furberg, ElisabetSkogman Thoursie, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Furberg, ElisabetSkogman Thoursie, Peter
By organisation
Department of PhilosophyDepartment of Economics
In the same journal
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Occupational Health and Environmental HealthPsychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 72 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf