Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comments on the optimization of high resolution Fabry-Pérot filtergraphs
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Astronomy.
2006 (English)In: Astronomy & Astrophysics, ISSN 0004-6361, Vol. 447, no 3, 1111-1120 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper we present results of simulations of Fabry-Pérot (FPI) system performance that address two entirely separate aspects. The first concerns the image quality of FPIs used in telecentric optical setups. We show that the image degradation from phase errors found by von der Lühe & Kentischer (2000, A&AS, 146, 499) can largely be compensated by refocusing and that the major cause of image degradation is the pupil apodization discussed by Beckers (1998, A&AS, 120, 191). We also discuss the optimization of FPI systems, considering the effects of cavity errors on the homogeneity of the instrument function (transmission profile) across the FOV when two FPIs are combined in a telecentric reimaging system. Our conclusions from several numerical experiments are that telecentric FPI systems that use two or more FPIs with high (94-95%) reflectivities are likely to show large variations in the instrument profile across the FOV unless the cavity errors are significantly smaller than 2.0 nm. We show, that such homogeneity can be obtained at relatively low "cost" in terms of increased parasitic light levels by lowering the reflectivity of the FPI with the smallest cavity separation rather then lowering the reflectivity of both FPIs. We also demonstrate that the choice of cavity ratios has a strong impact on the homogeneity of the spectral transmission profile across the FOV and that double FPI systems with cavity ratios around 0.3 perform much better than at around 0.6.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 447, no 3, 1111-1120 p.
Keyword [en]
telescopes, instrumentation: interferometers, instrumentation: polarimeters, techniques: high angular resolution, techniques: spectroscopic
National Category
Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-20173DOI: doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052981OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-20173DiVA: diva2:186698
Available from: 2007-03-01 Created: 2007-03-01 Last updated: 2011-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Scharmer, Göran
By organisation
Department of Astronomy
Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 18 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf