Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Priorities in Swedish alcohol and drug treatment: Policies, staff views and competing logics
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD).
2006 (English)In: Contemporary Drug Problems, ISSN 0091-4509, E-ISSN 2163-1808, Vol. 33, 367-399 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Federal Legal Publications , 2006. Vol. 33, 367-399 p.
Keyword [en]
Alcohol and drug problems, ethical reasoning, priority staff, treatment
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-22609OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-22609DiVA: diva2:189156
Note
Part of urn:nbn:se:su:diva-1003Available from: 2006-05-03 Created: 2006-05-03 Last updated: 2017-12-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Moral concerns - Treatment staff and user perspectives on alcohol and drug problems
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Moral concerns - Treatment staff and user perspectives on alcohol and drug problems
2006 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Constructions of alcohol and drug problems, as well as of treatment, show a great variation that can be understood from the perspective of societal needs to categorize individuals as deviant. The thesis deals with contemporary perspectives, among staff in treatment of alcohol and drug problems and a group of drug users, on alcohol and drug problems and how these problems should be handled in the public sphere. The thesis consists of four papers covering: (1) views of treatment staff on alcohol and drug problems, (2) views of treatment staff on gender issues, (3) views of treatment staff on priorities of client groups and (4) views on the “user” from the point of a union for drug users. The first three papers use questionnaire-data from a treatment systems study in Stockholm County. The first and third papers deal with questions directed to treatment staff whereas the second paper besides staff data analyses data from interviews with 1865 individuals entering treatment for alcohol and drug problems. The fourth paper is a discourse analysis of texts written by the Swedish users union.

The results shows that staff see alcohol and drug problems as social problems, diseases and moral problems. Staff also perceive men and women in treatment as different, both in terms of their problems and their treatment. These experienced differences were supported by comparisons between men and women in treatment in a few cases, but mostly differences were not that great or did not appear at all. When staff were asked to make priorities between groups of clients they seem to take past actions of the clients into account rather than using the egalitarian reasoning regulating priorities in official documents. Taking past actions into account indicates a moral approach to alcohol and drug problems. The analysis of the Swedish users union also points at a moral perspective on drug problems in the dominating drug policy discourse, pronounced in the opposition of the union. In this opposition the union constructs the user as a “consumer”, as “weak”, “sick” and “innocent”. The union shows signs of a human rights perspective, a public health perspective and a disease perspective as well as a direct opposition to the perspective of the user as a criminal.

Seen together the papers show the importance of categorizing subjects for and in treatment as well as the constructed nature of alcohol and drug problems. A moral perspective seems to be the base for many categorizations (distinguishing between normal and deviant as well as between more and less culpable “troubled persons”) and is not as clearly in conflict with medical and social perspectives as one might expect. The thesis also indicates a strengthened medical approach with connections to individualisation of problems and market orientation. To classify a certain group of individuals as deviants is important for our construction of normality and inclusiveness, whether the deviance is in terms of illness or moral failure. Treatment of deviance can be seen as a manifestation and reproduction of this categorization and research on treatment and deviance plays an important part in this process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Kriminologiska institutionen, 2006. 252 p.
Series
Avhandlingsserie / Kriminologiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet, ISSN 1404-1820 ; 19
Keyword
alcohol and drug problems, treatment, categorization, moralization, attitudes
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-1003 (URN)91-7155-255-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2006-05-24, Skandiasalen, hus 15, Kräftriket, Stockholm, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2006-05-03 Created: 2006-05-03 Last updated: 2016-05-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD)
In the same journal
Contemporary Drug Problems
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf