Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Testing the receiver bias hypothesis empirically with “virtual evolution”
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.
2005 (English)In: Animal Behaviour, ISSN 1095-8282, Vol. 70, no 4, 865-875 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many signals found in nature seem exaggerated, for instance in size or colour. According to the receiver bias hypothesis such signal features evolve as a consequence of nonfunctional response biases in receivers. In this study we tested this hypothesis using chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, in a virtual evolution experiment testing the potentiality of receiver bias to drive the evolution of exaggerated signals. The chickens played the role of receivers that can respond to the preferred stimuli displayed by the sender on a peck-sensitive computer screen. The preferred stimulus was kept and evolved, in the direction specified by the chicken, before being introduced to the next chicken of the successive generation. The chickens were tested on signals changing in three dimensions: length, intensity and area. In all three cases, the signals became considerably exaggerated and beyond what was required for accurate discrimination. Our results support the hypothesis that response biases emerging in discrimination tasks are sufficient to cause the evolution of signal exaggeration

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2005. Vol. 70, no 4, 865-875 p.
National Category
Zoology
Research subject
Zoology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-23212DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.02.008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-23212DiVA: diva2:190704
Note
Part of urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189Available from: 2004-05-19 Created: 2004-05-19 Last updated: 2010-01-22Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Evolution of signal form
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Evolution of signal form
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Visual signals, used for communication both within and between species, vary immensely in the forms that they take. How is it that all this splendour has evolved in nature? Since it is the receiver’s preferences that cause selective pressures on signals, elucidating the mechanism behind the response of the signal receiver is vital to gain a closer understanding of the evolutionary process. In my thesis I have therefore investigated how receivers, represented by chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, respond to different stimuli displayed on a peck-sensitive computer screen. According to the receiver bias hypothesis, animals and humans often express biases when responding to certain stimuli. These biases develop as by-products of how the recognition mechanism categorises and discriminates between stimuli. Since biases are generated from general stimulus processing mechanisms, they occur irrespective of species and type of signal, and it is often possible to predict the direction and intensity of the biases. One of the results from the experiments in my thesis demonstrates that similar experience in different species may generate similar biases. By giving chickens at least some of the experience of human faces as humans presumably have, the chickens subsequently expressed preferences for the same faces as a group of human subjects. Another kind of experience generated a bias for symmetry. This bias developed in the context of training chickens to recognise two mirror images of an asymmetrical stimulus. Untrained chickens and chickens trained on only one of the mirror images expressed no symmetry preferences. The bias produced by the training regime was for a specific symmetrical stimulus which had a strong resemblance to the familiar asymmetrical exemplar, rather than a general preference for symmetry. A further kind of experience, training chickens to respond to some stimuli but not to others, generated a receiver bias for exaggerated stimuli, whereas chickens trained on reversed stimuli developed a bias for less exaggerated stimuli. To investigate the potential of this bias to drive the evolution of signals towards exaggerated forms, a simplified evolutionary process was mimicked. The stimuli variants rejected by the chickens were eliminated, whereas the selected forms were kept and evolved prior to the subsequent display. As a result, signals evolved into exaggerated forms in all tested stimulus dimensions: length, intensity and area, despite the inclusion of a cost to the sender for using increasingly exaggerated signals. The bias was especially strong and persistent for stimuli varying along the intensity dimension where it remained despite extensive training. All the results in my thesis may be predicted by the receiver bias hypothesis. This implies that biases, developed due to stimuli experience, may be significant mechanisms driving the evolution of signal form.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Zoologiska institutionen, 2004. 23 p.
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189 (URN)91-7265-883-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2004-06-09, Sal G, Arrheniuslaboratorierna, Svante Arrhenius väg 14-18, Stockholm, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-05-19 Created: 2004-05-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Enquist, Magnus
By organisation
Department of Zoology
Zoology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 159 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf