Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transcendental idealism and the organism: essays on Kant
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2004 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The notion of the organism has a somewhat ambiguous status in Kant’s philosophy. On the one hand it belongs to natural science, on the other hand it is based on an analogy with the structure of reason. Biology therefore has a peculiar place among the sciences according to Kant: it is a natural science constituted by the use of a regulative maxim.

The present study places Kant’s views on biological teleology in the larger context of transcendental idealism. It consists of five essays. The first one treats the notions of things in themselves and appearances, arguing for an interpretation in terms of two aspects or perspectives rather than two worlds. The importance of the discursivity of our cognitive capacity is stressed, as well as the need to separate Kant’s various reflective perspectives. In the second essay this interpretation is applied to the third section of the Groundwork, arguing that this text does not belong to theoretical metaphysics, but rather to the articulation of a specifically practical perspective. The third essay discusses similarities and differences between Kant’s a priori conditions for cognition and conceptions of innate ideas in the rationalist tradition. Kant’s comparison of the system of categories with the biological theory of epigenesis is considered in connection to eighteenth century theories of generation. The comparison is viewed as an analogy rather than as a naturalistic theory of the a priori. In the fourth essay Kant’s account of functional attribution in biology is explicated in the context of the present day debate of the issue. It is claimed that Kant’s neo-Aristotelian approach avoids some of the difficulties in the dominant naturalistic accounts of today. Kant’s view differs from the Aristotelian in that it involves a distinction of levels, making it possible to take functional attributions on the one hand as objective from the standpoint of biology but on the other hand as having a merely regulative status from a philosophical point of view. In the fifth essay an interpretation of the antinomy of teleological judgment in the Critique of Judgment is offered. The antinomy is taken to consist in the dialectical tendency to treat the regulative maxims of teleology and mechanism as constitutive principles. The difference between the discursivity of the human understanding and the idea of a non-discursive understanding, an important theme in Kant’s solution of the antinomy, puts the question of biological teleology in relation to central tenets of transcendental idealism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International , 2004. , 221 p.
Series
Stockholm studies in philosophy, ISSN 0491-0877 ; 26
Keyword [en]
Kant, things in themselves, transcendental idealism, perspective, intelligible world, epigenesis, biological functions, teleology, organism, antinomy, regulative maxim, discursivity
Keyword [la]
acquisitio originaria
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-273ISBN: 91-22-02099-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-273DiVA: diva2:191805
Public defence
2004-11-19, hörsal 7, hus D, Universitetsvägen 10, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-10-28 Created: 2004-10-28 Last updated: 2012-10-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1335 kB)3204 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1335 kBChecksum SHA-1
3de68ec7096fc9d4e681ee90e7bb2d82be084210f50244d2b94d758c4a2a893de5ef7164
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3205 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2184 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf