Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Färder i österled: Experiment, källor, myter och analogier
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies.
2002 (Swedish)Book (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Institutionen för arkeologi, Stockholms universitet , 2002. , 133 p.
Series
Stockholm marine archaeology reports, ISSN 1401-0275 ; 2
National Category
Archaeology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-23594ISBN: 91-631-2017-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-23594DiVA: diva2:193092
Available from: 2005-02-17 Created: 2005-02-17 Last updated: 2017-06-01Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Vikingaskeppet Ormen Friskes undergång: Ett drama i det kalla krigets skugga
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Vikingaskeppet Ormen Friskes undergång: Ett drama i det kalla krigets skugga
2005 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[de]
Der untergang des Wikingerschiffes "Ormen Friske" : Ein Drama im Schatten des Kalten Krieges
Abstract [en]

This dissertation consists of three separately published parts, all dealing with problems involving reconstructions of Viking Age ships, travelling experiments with such ships and people’s relations and attitudes to them.

The Ormen Friske, a Swedish replica of the Norwegian Gokstad ship, sank in the North Sea in June 1950, drowning all 15 on board. The ship was caught in ugly weather and steered for Helgoland, but at the same time U.S. aircraft carried out a high-altitude practice bombing run, targeting the island, unintentionally preventing the ship from reaching sheltered waters. Swedish officials suppressed the role of the bombing in the accident and rejected proposals for an inspection of the wreck. The disaster was instead blamed on the ship’s alleged deficiencies and the crew’s inexperience. The reason for the cover-up was to avoid annoying the Western allies. Most of the ship’s wreckage was then cleared away. But a few parts and artifacts were safeguarded, some of which still survive in museums, archives and private homes. They are discussed in terms of the varying meaning attributed to them by different authorities and people involved. Also, the remaining artifacts have their sentimental value thanks to their accompanying narratives. Together with graves and memorial sites these objects continue to mark people’s memories and conception of the disaster.

The archaeologist studying the contemporary past must move beyond Archaeology’s traditional sources. Documents and files in government and private archives, letters, photos, newspaper articles, interviews, ethno-archaeological experiments and participating observation may be used. He shall feel free to intersect borders to other disciplines, fitting and interpreting evidence into a narrative context.

Archaeology of the contemporary past deals with issues inseparable from the present and is therefore unevitably controversial. It is argued that the scholar should apply a reflexive approach, also scrutinizing his own background, social position and research incentives.

During the 1990’s the author co-organized a number of experimental river journeys in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Latvia, analyzing the results in an archaeological, etnographical and historical context. The ship formed the required experimental platform but the essential feature was the voyage itself. Rowing vessels of the Scandinavian type upstream, through rapids and long portages, proved to be a strong, often impossible, challenge even for a very well trained and singe-minded crew. It is improbable that travellers ever brought ships all the way from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea. It is suggested that Viking Age travellers instead traversed the part of the route ”From the Varangians to the Greeks” between the Novgorod area and the upper Dnepr area by foot or horse and sledge during winter. Russian archaeological material supports this explanatory model. The popular image of Viking ships crossing Russia on rivers seems, at least in part, to derive from folklore and legends in an international tradition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Rune Edberg, 2005. 291 p.
Series
Södertörn archaeological studies, ISSN 1652-2559 ; 2
Keyword
Ormen Friske, Viking ship replica, Gokstad ship, Helgoland, Cold War, Archaeology of the contemporary past
National Category
Archaeology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-373 (URN)91-628-5977-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2005-03-11, föreläsningssalen, Botanicum, Lilla Frescativägen 5, Stockholm, 13:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2005-02-17 Created: 2005-02-17 Last updated: 2011-12-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3403 kB)912 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3403 kBChecksum SHA-512
91a499449f0d85e910edecfe5495b08a2e45c23c4d82c94ec8aa6277acc7ef561a84c304d089b8fa5be6cced003b459ef70d786cdf3588b96fb062f665e54ffe
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies
Archaeology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 912 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 293 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf