Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Momentum & Liquidity: Do Liquidity Strategies Add Return?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Business.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Business.
2005 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Momentum can be explained as a passive strategy which is rebalanced continually over time. It can be divided into a long position in observed “winners”, and a short position in observed “losers”. This study tries to find out if some kind of liquidity strategy can increase any abnormal return generated by a conventional momentum strategy. Our data is based on monthly returns from all listed companies at Stockholm Stock Exchange between January 1997 and June 2005. We have, in addition to a plain momentum strategy, composed four different liquidity strategies, based on four different observing periods and four different holding periods. Our findings show that momentum has been present during our observation period, where the most profitable portfolio has an observation period of 3 months and a holding period of 6 months, and generates an abnormal return of 253 percent. Or findings from adding liquidity as a second component show that the most profitable strategy is to reverse the high-low strategy with observe and hold periods of 12 months, which has generated an abnormal return of 345% and a risk-adjusted alpha of 0.411. We can also conclude that additional abnormal and risk-adjusted return has been generated by adding liquidity as a second component to plain momentum. Overall the prevailing strategy regarding liquidity is to go long in low volume loser or short in high volume losers. We also find that the most extreme values are generated in the 12 month holding period portfolios. Reasonable explanations for these findings might be derived from a potential steeper upside in low liquidity losers, company specific characteristics and behavioural theories, but can not be concluded beyond reasonable doubt out of the results in this paper.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005.
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-6043OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-6043DiVA: diva2:195966
Uppsok
samhälle/juridik
Available from: 2007-01-05 Created: 2007-01-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(432 kB)1333 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 432 kBChecksum MD5
b12cfc000f8a42f635ecf9c409e3cb8a2a090d4ff278961f6d3854002e7d6de2ed8125e0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Business
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1333 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 432 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf