Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Prior informed consent and hazardous trade: Regulating trade in hazardous goods at the intersection of sovereignty, free trade and environmental protection
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2007 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation analyses international and to some extent domestic law pertaining to trade in hazardous substances. Hazardous trade regulation is found to promote or accommodate three objectives in particular: the strengthening of the ability of (importing) States to exercise control of transboundary flows of hazardous substances; the protection of human health and environment; and the avoidance of impediments to the free flow of goods. The simultaneous pursuance of these objectives entails potential or actual conflicts.

Among the regulatory instruments employed for controlling hazardous trade particular attention is given to prior informed consent (PIC) procedures. These have the potential to strengthen the effective sovereignty of importing States, i.e. their ability to make and enforce informed decisions with respect to import of hazardous substances. These procedures are also compared with export bans, import bans and export notification procedures. It is inter alia asked where different trade-restricting measures place the right to make decisions and whether that right is combined with any means by which such decisions may be enforced.

It is concluded that there is no general international law requirement for PIC for transboundary shipments of hazardous substances. Such a requirement may, however, with certain caveats be substantiated for hazardous wastes. It is also concluded that the effective operation of PIC procedures requires the availability of substantial resources in both exporting States and importing States. This may argue for the application of e.g. export bans to particularly hazardous substances. PIC procedures are on the other hand more flexible, better at empowering importing States and are also less likely to conflict with free-trade law than many bans. PIC is in itself no guarantee for a particular level of environmental protection.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Juridiska institutionen , 2007. , 348 p.
Keyword [en]
informed consent, PIC, trade bans, effective sovereignty, environmental law, free-trade law, hazardous substances, wastes, chemicals, GMOs
National Category
Law and Society
Research subject
Environmental Law
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-7164ISBN: 978-91-7155-541-0OAI: diva2:197748
Public defence
2007-12-14, hörsal 4, hus B, Universitetsvägen 10, Stockholm, 10:00
Available from: 2007-11-22 Created: 2007-11-06 Last updated: 2010-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Law
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 771 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link