Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Birds of Feather Flock Together – and Fall Ill?: Migrant Homophily and Health in Sweden
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS).
2010 (English)In: Sociology of Health and Illnes, ISSN 0141-9889, E-ISSN 1467-9566, Vol. 32, no 3, 382-399 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although studies show that health inequities between ethnic groups exist, few have expressed interest in the origins of these disparities. As homophily (the phenomenon that people principally form relationships with those who are similar to them) influences people’s norms and interactions, it might be an important property of migrants’ networks, and have implications on their health. The aim of this study is to examine health inequities between natives and immigrants in Sweden and the health consequences arising from participation in homogenous migrant networks. Using total population registers and representative survey data initial analyses show that migrants experience poorer health than native Swedes. The findings further suggest that homophily is a prominent feature of migrant social networks and that migrants in networks with a high proportion of other migrants experience poorer health than those who include a high proportion of natives in their networks. However, unhealthy behaviour and disadvantaged social conditions may account for a considerable share of their excess risk. Hence, network closure may reinforce and maintain norms leading to negative behaviour and social conditions in such networks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 32, no 3, 382-399 p.
Keyword [en]
homophily, health inequity, migrant, networks, ethnicity
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-24824DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01196.xOAI: diva2:198384
Available from: 2008-04-24 Created: 2008-04-24 Last updated: 2011-03-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Healthy bridges: Studies of social capital, welfare, and health
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Healthy bridges: Studies of social capital, welfare, and health
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to study whether social capital is related to health and health inequality, and to investigate the significance of welfare state features for levels of social capital. Another aim is to examine whether social capital may be important for the relation between the welfare state and health. A final aim is to examine the downsides of social capital in relation to health.

The theoretical definition of social capital guiding this thesis suggests that it comprises social resources that evolve in social networks and social structures characterized by mutual trust. These social resources, in turn, facilitate access to various instrumental and expressive returns, which might benefit the individual as well as the collective.

The findings suggest that universal welfare states generally seem to have a positive influence on levels of social capital, as social capital increased rather than decreased during the time period when the Swedish welfare state was maturing. Accordingly, cross-national comparisons show that the highest levels of social capital are to be found in the universal welfare states, amongst them Sweden.

The findings further show that both individual and collective social capital are related to various health outcomes, although the most robust findings are found at the individual level. Some of the findings also support that associations may be causal. Hence, social capital may be considered an important social determinant of health. Moreover, social capital at the individual level is important in explaining health inequalities especially between groups based on country of birth in Sweden, whereas collective social capital is important in explaining health inequalities between clusters of European countries, grouped into welfare regimes. Thus, social capital seems important in explaining and understanding health inequalities both between and within countries.

Finally, the principle of migrant homophily – when migrants chiefly interact with other migrants – has negative consequences for migrants’ health in Sweden. However, only those migrants included in homogenous and closed networks have poorer health. This supports the hypothesis that social capital chiefly has negative health externalities when social networks are characterized by a high degree of network closure, lacking bridges to other networks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Sociologiska institutionen, 2008. 81 p.
Health Equity Studies, ISSN 1651-5390 ; 1651-5390
Sweden, social capital, welfare state, health, migrant
National Category
Research subject
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-7486 (URN)978-91-7155-638-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-05-16, Aula Svea, Socialhögskolan, Sveaplan, Stockholm, 10:00
Available from: 2008-04-24 Created: 2008-04-24 Last updated: 2011-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rostila, Mikael
By organisation
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS)
In the same journal
Sociology of Health and Illnes
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 75 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link