Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparing alternative employment to permanent full-time work: How do employment contract and perceived job conditions relate to health complaints?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Responsible organisation
2005 In: Work & Stress, ISSN 0267-8373, Vol. 19, no 4, 301-318 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 19, no 4, 301-318 p.
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-25314OAI: diva2:199452
Part of urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8030Available from: 2008-08-25 Created: 2008-08-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Alternative employment and well-being: Contract heterogeneity and differences among individuals
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Alternative employment and well-being: Contract heterogeneity and differences among individuals
2008 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The increasing use of temporary and part-time employment in recent decades was initially expected to lead to negative effects for the individual. The empirical evidence, however, has been equivocal and the consequences are therefore still unclear. This thesis adopts a psychological approach to alternative employment by investigating how heterogeneity in employment contracts together with individual differences associate with work attitudes and subjective well-being. It comprises four studies in which questionnaire data is used to study differences among temporary workers (Study I & II) and differences in the alternative workforce (fixed-term, on-call, and part-time workers) compared to permanent full-time workers (Study III & IV), in order to analyze the impact of different types of contracts together with individual differences. Study I found that attitudes, role stress, and health varied across different patterns in individuals’ backgrounds and contract forms. Study II demonstrated that distinct patterns of voluntary and involuntary contract motives and of work involvement associated with differences in reported work-related and general well-being. Study III showed that well-being and organizational attitudes were related to individuals’ job and contract preferences and, to some degree, heterogeneity in contract types. Study IV revealed that individuals’ perceptions of job conditions (control, demands, and job insecurity) predicted well-being, whereas type of employment contract was found to be less important. Employment contract forms, however, interacted with individual diversity in Study III and IV. The thesis concludes that differences among individuals are important for understanding the implications of different types of alternative employment contracts. Future research should focus on these interactive mechanisms to better understand the consequences of alternative employment forms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Psykologiska institutionen, 2008. 83 p.
Employment contract, temporary work, part-time work, individual characteristics, contract motives, work involvement, job characteristics, work-related attitudes, well-being, health
National Category
Research subject
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-8030 (URN)978-91-7155-691-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2008-09-15, David Magnussonsalen (U31), hus 8, Frescati Hagväg 8, Stockholm, 10:00
Available from: 2008-08-25 Created: 2008-08-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 59 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link