Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Upphovsrätt i konkurrens: särskilt om tvångslicensiering
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2004 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Although copyright law, on the one hand, establishes far-reaching exclusive rights and institutes legal monopolies while antitrust law, on the other hand, curtails the undue exercise of market power, there is no fundamental incongruity between the two regimes. The general harmony does not, however, preclude the occasional existence of glaring dissonances. Tension does exist on the fringe.

The thesis addresses the intersection of copyright and antitrust. More specifically it attempts to ascertain and clarify the circumstances under which a unilateral and unconditional refusal to license violates Article 82 of the EC Treaty, i.e. the provision on abuse of a dominant position, and its Swedish counterpart, Sect. 19 of the National Competition Act, and, consequently, when antitrust based compulsory licensing can be invoked.

A general examination of the structure and purpose of copyright, the object of protection and its delimitations in favour of a competitive environment is carried out. The copyright regime’s own system of specific limitations and exceptions is also surveyed, as well as the possible introduction of a “fair use” provision in favour of competition.

The methodology used in antitrust to estimate market power in relation to copyright is examined, as well as the prospects of successfully challenging an unconditional, unilateral refusal to license under the abuse of dominance provision. Particular emphasis is placed on the so-called “exceptional circumstances” test.

The thesis also addresses the “false dichotomy” between an internal solution (within copyright law) and an external solution (antitrust intervention) to the competition problems caused by copyright. Since the problems vary in character and magnitude an “either… or” approach seems flawed. Instead, the use of both models, simultaneously applied, can be advocated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Juridiska institutionen , 2004. , 386 p.
Keyword [en]
Intellectual Property, Copyright, Compulsory licence, Compulsory licensing, abuse, Article 82, Antitrust, Competition law
Keyword [sv]
Immaterialrätt, Upphovsrätt, tvångslicensiering, tvångslicens, missbruk, konkurrensrätt, Artikel 82
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-90ISBN: 91-7265-855-X (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-90DiVA: diva2:200616
Public defence
2004-04-23, Reinholdsalen, Juristernas hus, Frescativägen 18, Stockholm, 10:00
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2004-04-01 Created: 2004-04-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 324 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf