Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
UNGA SEXUALFÖRBRYTAREBarn eller brottslingar?: En studie av domstolens konstruktion av barn som begår sexualbrott och motivering av påföljd
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
2008 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to gain more knowledge of which discourses dominate the courts’ decisions concerning sentences for young sexual offenders. The issues touched upon were which circumstances the courts find important and which discourses reflect those circumstances when deciding on sentences for young sexual offenders as well as how children that commit crimes are constructed by the court. The study looked at cases of sexual offence where the offender was between 15 and 17 years old, and was based on judgements established at the Stockholm district courts in 2007 and 2008. The method used was content analysis, both manifesto and latent. By using content analysis the information was structured into a manageable basis for the following discourse analysis, which was implemented according to the theory for this study described in King and Piper’s (1995) book How the Law Thinks About Children. Discourse analysis gave an insight into which discourses are most prominent in verdicts against young sexual offenders. The results show that the social services’ recommendations are not given much importance in the courts’ decisions of suitable sentences for young sexual offenders. A majority of the youths were sentenced to criminal punishment such as a youth community order service and a youth detention order. Factors of particular importance in the verdicts are the specifics of the crime, whether or not the offenders understood or should have understood that they were committing a crime, responsibility, age, consent, suitable sentences as well as the credibility and reliability of given statements. The young defendants were constructed by the courts as criminals with regard to the criminal act and the youths’ responsibility for the action. The offenders’ personal and social situation was not given particular importance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. , 41 p.
Keyword [en]
Young offender, sexual offender, sentence, punishment, care, discourse.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-26351OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-26351DiVA: diva2:208722
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok

Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2009-03-24 Created: 2009-03-19 Last updated: 2009-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(278 kB)359 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 278 kBChecksum SHA-512
388f16434fc93b8f1e87b813991e5bf06cf5910a51b01a60bad520c9555dae0ac36ff069c3b1b965f71b8a9600050d8283dc88086a031e91bf73d7d8cd39d302
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 359 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 189 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf