Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Exclusion by interference competition? The relationship between red and arctic foxes
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5496-4727
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5535-9086
2002 (English)In: Oecologia, ISSN 0029-8549, E-ISSN 1432-1939, Vol. 132, no 2, 213-220 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The distribution of many predators may be limited by interactions with larger predator species. The arctic fox in mainland Europe is endangered, while the red fox is increasing its range in the north. It has been suggested that the southern distribution limit of the arctic fox is determined by interspecific competition with the red fox. This has been criticised, on the basis that the species co-exist on a regional scale. However, if the larger red fox is superior and interspecific competition important, the arctic fox should avoid close contact, especially during the breeding season. Consequently, the distribution of breeding dens for the two species would be segregated on a much smaller spatial and temporal scale, in areas where they are sympatric. We tested this hypothesis by analysing den use of reproducing arctic and red foxes over 9 years in Sweden. High quality dens were inhabited by reproducing arctic foxes more often when no red foxes bred in the vicinity. Furthermore, in two out of three cases when arctic foxes did reproduce near red foxes, juveniles were killed by red foxes. We also found that breeding arctic foxes occupied dens at higher altitudes than red foxes did. in a large-scale field experiment, red foxes were removed, but the results were not conclusive. However, we conclude that on the scale of individual territories, arctic foxes avoid areas with red foxes. Through interspecific interference competition, the red fox might thus be excluding the arctic fox from breeding in low altitude habitat, which is most important in years when food abundance is limited and competition is most fierce. With high altitude refuges being less suitable, even small-scale behavioural effects could scale up to significant effects at the population level.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2002. Vol. 132, no 2, 213-220 p.
Keyword [en]
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-29717DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0967-8ISBN: 0029-8549OAI: diva2:234772
ISI Document Delivery No.: 580PL Times Cited: 35 Cited Reference Count: 52Available from: 2009-09-10 Created: 2009-09-10 Last updated: 2014-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elmhagen, BodilAngerbjörn, Anders
By organisation
Department of Zoology
In the same journal

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 109 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link