Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Toxicology.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Journal of Radiological Protection, ISSN 0952-4746, Vol. 29, no 2A, A29-42 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Natural radiation is the major source of human exposure to ionising radiation, and its largest contributing component to effective dose arises from inhalation of (222)Rn and its radioactive progeny. However, despite extensive knowledge of radiation risks gained through epidemiologic investigations and mechanistic considerations, the health effects of chronic low-level radiation exposure are still poorly understood. The present paper reviews the possible contribution of studies of populations living in high natural background radiation (HNBR) areas (Guarapari, Brazil; Kerala, India; Ramsar, Iran; Yangjiang, China), including radon-prone areas, to low dose risk estimation. Much of the direct information about risk related to HNBR comes from case-control studies of radon and lung cancer, which provide convincing evidence of an association between long-term protracted radiation exposures in the general population and disease incidence. The success of these studies is mainly due to the careful organ dose reconstruction (with relatively high doses to the lung), and to the fact that large-scale collaborative studies have been conducted to maximise the statistical power and to ensure the systematic collection of information on potential confounding factors. In contrast, studies in other (non-radon) HNBR areas have provided little information, relying mainly on ecological designs and very rough effective dose categorisations. Recent steps taken in China and India to establish cohorts for follow-up and to conduct nested case-control studies may provide useful information about risks in the future, provided that careful organ dose reconstruction is possible and information is collected on potential confounding factors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 29, no 2A, A29-42 p.
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-32406DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S03PubMedID: 19454802OAI: diva2:280397
Available from: 2009-12-09 Created: 2009-12-09 Last updated: 2010-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wojcik, Andrzej
By organisation
Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Toxicology
In the same journal
Journal of Radiological Protection

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 119 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link