Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gauging the ungauged basin: how many discharge measurements are needed?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.
2009 (English)In: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 13, no 6, 883-892 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Runoff estimation in ungauged catchments is probably one of the most basic and oldest tasks of hydrologists. This long-standing issue has received increased attention recently due to the PUB (Prediction in Ungauged Basins) initiative. Given the challenges of predicting runoff for ungauged catchments one might argue that the best course of action is to take a few runoff measurements. In this study we explored how implementing such a procedure might support predictions in an ungauged basin. We used a number of monitored Swedish catchments as hypothetical ungauged basins where we pretended to start with no runoff data and then added different sub-sets of the available data to constrain a simple catchment model. These sub-sets consisted of a limited number of single runoff measurements; in other words these data represent what could be measured with limited efforts in an ungauged basin. We used a Monte Carlo approach and predicted runoff as a weighted ensemble mean of simulations using acceptable parameter sets. We found that the ensemble prediction clearly outperformed the predictions using single parameter sets and that surprisingly little runoff data was necessary to identify model parameterizations that provided good results for the 'ungauged' test periods. These results indicated that a few runoff measurements can contain much of the information content of continuous runoff time series. However, the study also indicated that results may differ significantly between catchments and also depend on the days chosen for taking the measurements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 13, no 6, 883-892 p.
Keyword [en]
rainfall-runoff models, calibration data, parameter uncertainty, regionalization, predictions, future
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-32777ISI: 000267543200013ISBN: 1027-5606 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-32777DiVA: diva2:281509
Available from: 2009-12-16 Created: 2009-12-16 Last updated: 2009-12-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(441 kB)513 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 441 kBChecksum SHA-512
c25eb1fad04d71dfae071d306defdfab2f49cb544d8f601cfd1b6b383416f348552830e087ec4dfe5d29dce8416c3d5532fb74c6b5cb79cf612be36604a84f3f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

link to journal

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Seibert, J.
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 513 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 140 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf