Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Investigating biodiversity trajectories using scenarios – Lessons from two contrasting agricultural landscapes
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Systems Ecology. Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 91, 499-508 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Agriculture is the major land use at a global scale. In addition to food production, multifunctionality of landscapes, including values and ecosystem services like biodiversity, recreation and culture, is now focus for management. This study explores how a scenario approach, involving different stakeholders, may help to improve landscape management for biodiversity conservation. Local farmers and executives at the County Administrative Board were invited to discuss rural development and conditions for farmland biodiversity in two Swedish landscapes. The potential biodiversity for three future land use scenarios for the two landscapes was discussed: nature conservation, outdoor recreation and energy production, and compared with current and historical landscapes in each region.

Analyses of habitat areas, connectedness and landscape diversity suggested that the energy and recreation scenarios had a negative impact on farmland biodiversity, whereas the nature conservation scenario, the current and historically reconstructed landscapes had a higher potential for biodiversity. The farmers appreciated the nature conservation scenario, but also the energy production scenario and they highlighted the need of increased subsidies for management of biodiversity. The farmers in the high production area were less interested in nature quality per se. The executives had similar opinions as the farmers, but disagreed on the advantages with energy production, as this would be in conflict with the high biodiversity and recreational values. The local physical and socio-economical conditions differ between landscapes and potentially shaped the stakeholders emotional attachment to the local environment, their opinions and decisions on how to manage the land. We stress the importance of incorporating local knowledge, visions and regional prerequisites for different land uses in conservation, since site and landscape specific planning for biodiversity together with a flexible subsidy system are necessary to reach the conservation goals within EU.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 91, 499-508 p.
National Category
Ecology Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-32958DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.018ISI: 000272952000020OAI: diva2:282043
Available from: 2009-12-18 Created: 2009-12-18 Last updated: 2013-06-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Systems EcologyStockholm Resilience CentreDepartment of Physical Geography and Quaternary GeologyDepartment of Botany
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Management
EcologyEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 35 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link