Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Practical tool for landscape planning? An empirical investigation of network based models of habitat fragmentation.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Systems Ecology. Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Systems Ecology. Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
2009 (English)In: Ecography, ISSN 0906-7590, E-ISSN 1600-0587, Vol. 32, no 1, 123-132 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study presents a graph-theoretical modelling approach using daily movements and habitat demands of different target bird species in an urban context to assess: 1) habitable land cover types, 2) threshold distances between patches of habitat, 3) the required minimum accessible habitat areas and 4) the effects of barriers and stepping stones. The modelling approach is tested using empirical data from field surveys in the urban area of Stockholm, Sweden.

The results show that groups of small habitat patches can house the same species as larger contiguous patches as long as they are perceived as functionally connected by the inhabitant organisms. Furthermore, we found that binary habitat/non-habitat representations of the landscape could roughly explain the variation in species occurrence, as long as habitat was properly defined. However, the explanatory power of the landscape models increased when features of matrix heterogeneity such as stepping stones and barriers were accounted for.

Synthesis and application: in a world where forest ecosystems are becoming increasingly fragmented there is an urgent need to find comprehensive and scientifically relevant methods for managing and planning ecosystems. This study shows that: 1) groups of well placed small habitat patches can, together, be sufficient to attract birds in intensively developed areas, 2) the presented modelling approach can help identify such groups of patches, 3) matrix heterogeneity should preferably be accounted for, and 4) proper assessments of habitable land cover types are important. Finally, we argue that the modelling approach applied here may substantially improve landscape management and planning at scales ranging from whole landscapes down to neighbourhoods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 32, no 1, 123-132 p.
National Category
Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-34129DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05435.xISI: 000264880300015OAI: diva2:284360
Available from: 2010-01-06 Created: 2010-01-06 Last updated: 2012-02-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Systems EcologyStockholm Resilience Centre
In the same journal
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 56 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link