Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Addressing trade-offs: Experiences from conservation and development initiatives in the Mkuze Wetlands, South Africa
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.
Natural Resource Institute, University of Manitoba.
2009 (English)In: Ecology & society, ISSN 1708-3087, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 14, no 2, online- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Present-day conservation policies generally include the aim to integrate biodiversity conservation and local development, and describe this as a win–win solution that can satisfy all interests. This is challenged by research claiming that many efforts fail to match practice to rhetoric. South Africa has made strong commitments to fulfill the dual goals of conservation and development, and the iSimangaliso Wetland Park is promoted as an example of this. We explore present and potential outcomes of conservation and development interventions in a community bordering the Wetland Park through the perspective of different stakeholders, with the aim of uncovering opportunities and risks. In terms of improving local livelihoods as well as involvement in conservation, the success of the studied interventions varied. Local communities may accept restrictions on resource use as a result of realistic and fairly negotiated trade-offs, but if perceived as unjust and imposed from above, then mistrust and resistance will increase. In this area, collaboration between conservation organizations and the local community had improved, but still faced problems associated with unequal power relations, unrealistic expectations, and a lack of trust, transparency, and communication. As unsustainable efforts are a waste of funds and engagement, and may even become counterproductive, policy visions need to be matched by realistic allocations of staff, time, funds, and training. At the national and international level, the true cost of conservation has to be recognized and budgeted for if efforts at integrating conservation and development are to succeed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Resilience Alliance, 2009. Vol. 14, no 2, online- p.
Keyword [en]
integrated conservation and development, Mkuze Wetlands, natural resource management, protected area, rural livelihoods, South Africa, trade-offs
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-35590ISI: 000278707200012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-35590DiVA: diva2:287592
Projects
The Mkuze Wetlands, South Africa: facing the dilemma of conserving biodiversity and sustaining rural livelihoods
Available from: 2010-01-19 Created: 2010-01-19 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art37
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology
In the same journal
Ecology & society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf