Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Groupthink in Academia: Majoritarian Departmental Politics and the Professional Pyramid
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
2009 (English)In: The Independent Review: a journal of political economy, ISSN 1086-1653, Vol. 13, no 4, 585-600 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although academia differs from the settings explored by groupthink theorists, it exhibits many of the same tendencies and failings. One result is the relative absence of classical-liberal and conservative viewpoints among humanities and social sciences professors, especially in the more elite departments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oakland, CA: The Independent Institute , 2009. Vol. 13, no 4, 585-600 p.
Keyword [en]
Professors Groupthink Academia Majoritarian voting
National Category
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-36624ISI: 000264384500007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-36624DiVA: diva2:289832
Available from: 2010-01-25 Created: 2010-01-25 Last updated: 2015-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Fri fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stern, Charlotta
By organisation
Department of Sociology
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf