Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Interpretation of the dosimetric results of three uniformity regularization methods in terms of expected treatment outcome.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Medical Radiation Physics (together with KI).
2008 (English)In: Medical physics (Lancaster), ISSN 0094-2405, Vol. 35, no 11, 5009-18 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In IMRT treatment plan optimization there are various methods that try to regularize the variation of dose nonuniformity using purely dosimetric measures. However, although these methods can help in finding a good dose distribution, they do not provide any information regarding the expected treatment outcome. When a treatment plan optimization is performed using biological measures, the final goal should be some indication about the expected tumor control or normal tissue complications, which is the primary goal of treatment planning (the association of treatment configurations and dose prescription with the treatment outcome). In this study, this issue is analyzed distinguishing the dose-oriented treatment plan optimization from the response-oriented optimization. Three different dose distributions were obtained by using a dose-based optimization technique, an EUD-based optimization without applying any technique for regularizing the nonuniformity of the dose distribution, and an EUD-based optimization using a variational regularization technique, which controls dose nonuniformity. The clinical effectiveness of the three dose distributions was investigated by calculating the response probabilities of the tumors and organs-at-risk (OARs) involved in two head and neck and prostate cancer cases. The radiobiological models used are the linear-quadratic-Poisson and the Relative Seriality models. Furthermore, the complication-free tumor control probability and the biologically effective uniform dose (D) were used for treatment plan evaluation and comparison. The radiobiological comparison shows that the EUD-based optimization using L-curve regularization gives better results than the EUD-based optimization without regularization and dose-based optimization in both clinical cases. Concluding, it appears that the applied dose nonuniformity regularization technique is expected to improve the effectiveness of the optimized IMRT dose distributions. However, more patient cases are needed to validate the statistical significance of the results and conclusions presented in this paper.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 35, no 11, 5009-18 p.
Keyword [en]
Radiometry, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Treatment
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Research subject
Medical Radiation Physics
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-37651ISI: 000260484400028PubMedID: 19070235OAI: diva2:305793
Available from: 2010-03-25 Created: 2010-03-17 Last updated: 2010-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Medical Radiation Physics (together with KI)
In the same journal
Medical physics (Lancaster)
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 22 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link