Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparing Two Approaches to Context: Realism and Constructivism
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences.
2005 (English)In: Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility, 2005Conference paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

During the last few years, there have been debates over what is context and how computers should act upon it. Two disparate camps of thought can be recognized. First, Real-ism, having its roots in natural sciences, believes that con-texts exist out there and that, if properly instrumented and programmed, computers can correctly recognize and adapt to them. Second, Constructivism, having its roots in human and social sciences, believes that contexts are human creations, mental and social, and that computers ought to provide resources for managing them. We reveal some fundamental differences between the two in three different application domains. We show that despite the deep-going controversies, both camps benefit from considering the alternative approach and a middle ground can be found.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-38042OAI: diva2:305875
Available from: 2010-03-25 Created: 2010-03-25 Last updated: 2011-03-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 9 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link