Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
When superior courts reach different conclusions in the same child sexual abuse cases: – is there a lesson to be learned?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2008 (English)In: Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, ISSN 1544-4759, E-ISSN 1544-4767, Vol. 5, no 3, 171-187 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The objective of this study was to analyse Swedish child sexual abuse cases from 1989 to 2004 characterised by the following: (1) conviction in first trial in a court of appeal; (2) the Supreme Court later accepted a petition for a new trial; and (3) acquittal in second trial in the same court of appeal (with new judges). The study was conducted to determine what criteria were used for evaluating psychological child-related information and how they were applied. Eight argument themes were identified in the reasoning of the courts: (1) ability to perceive, remember, and communicate about experiences in a reliable way; (2) influence before first forensic interview; (3) influence during forensic interview/s; (4) motives for disclosing/retracting; (5) statement characteristics; (6) disclosure process; (7) behaviour and/or emotions related to investigations/interviews; and (8) psychological symptoms. The arguing of the courts was classified as belonging to one of three categories for each argument theme: (1) supporting/challenging the allegations; (2) opposing a conceivably supportive/challenging argument; and (3) indifferent. In six of the nine cases, arguments belonging to the same theme were presented in both court proceedings. Diametrically opposite conclusions were reached in 15 of 20 of these examples and same conclusion in one case. The evaluation method/s seemingly underlying the child psychological arguments of the courts may have a low reliability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 5, no 3, 171-187 p.
Keyword [en]
child sexual abuse sweden
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-38163DOI: 10.1002/jip.84OAI: diva2:306470
Available from: 2010-03-29 Created: 2010-03-29 Last updated: 2010-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lainpelto, Katrin
By organisation
Department of Law
In the same journal
Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 46 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link