Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Australian Manufacturing Industry During the 1970s: An International Comparison and Implications for the ASEAN Countries
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for International Economic Studies.
1983 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

One of the arguments for trade is that is enables countries to specialise in production of goods in which they have comparative advantage, eg in the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model. Regarding consumption, trade allows countries to consumer more of (a larger number of) goods than it would have under autarky. In this paper we start off by looking into these very basic propositions with an emphasis on Australia's structural change in manufacturing production 1970-79 compared with other industrialized countries.

As a result of this investigation we extended the analysis to the demand side and the ASEAN countries. Thus in sections III:3 and IV:1 the link between home demand and domestic manufacturing production is analysed and compared between different developed and ASEAN countries. ASEAN coutnries' situation vis-a-vis Australia is focussed upon specifically in section IV not least with regard to textile, clothing and footwear. the paper ends with a summary in section V.

When investigating the validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model's predictions for trade pattern, one limits oneself to commodities where labour and capital are principal factors of production. This avoids natural resource intensive commodities on the assumption that the location of that type of production is determined by countries' endowments of particular natural resources. Eg Krueger (1977) concludes on empirical testing "that a meaningful interpretation of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model must lie within the manufacturing sector in a world of many countries. Once the focus is so shifted, it becomes immediately apparent that the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson predictions are more likely to be borne out in patterns of specialization within manufacturing [production) than in comparisons of factors proportions in the exporting and import competing industries" (p. 43).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: IIES , 1983. , 53 p.
Series
Seminar Paper / Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, ISSN 0347-8769 ; 255
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-41493OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-41493DiVA: diva2:330681
Available from: 2010-07-20 Created: 2010-07-19 Last updated: 2010-07-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6446 kB)366 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6446 kBChecksum SHA-512
2eac84ae22c8f1f5abfda688b4bacffca54a4014ba0129b6f61ce688497b6d24579c86d12e5295e9ef1900eec70cc81a4aace52538f7b9b4847ffd399811f572
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Institute for International Economic Studies
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 366 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf