Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The information accuracy of SRI markets: A comparative study between SRI-screening firms and Auditing firms
Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The sustainability of Social Responsible Investments (SRI) markets is highly dependent on the accuracy of social and environmental information. Surprisingly, and in contrast to financial information, there exists no methodological standard for gathering social and environmental information in SRI markets. This work is a first contribution to the understanding of how SRI-analysts verify the accuracy of social and environmental information. A second aim of this thesis is to evaluate if SRI-analysts can produce an accurate output with their respective methodologies. To do so, a case study was performed comparing the assessment of social and environmental information at SRI-screening firms to the more regulated financial auditing process, using legal a categorization of evidence strengths as a model. The findings of this study suggest that practices are not standardized amongst SRI-analysts. Therefore, investors are unlikely to receive an equal degree of information accuracy from one analyst to the next. Moreover, when comparing SRI-screening and financial auditing using the legal categorization of evidence, it was found that screening firms tend to produce outputs that are less carefully verified than seen in their financial counterparts. Nevertheless, the findings also reveal that SRI-analysts generally acknowledge the importance of assessing sources of evidence when controlling information accuracy. In conclusion, a standardized methodology should be welcomed by SRI-analysts, and the legal categorization of evidence strengths could be a good starting point to manage information accuracy in their screening process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 62 p.
Keyword [en]
Social Responsible Investment (SRI), information accuracy, SRI-screening, financial audit, evidence
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-45729OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-45729DiVA: diva2:369454
Uppsok
Life Earth Science
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-11-10 Created: 2010-11-10 Last updated: 2010-11-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(688 kB)346 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 688 kBChecksum SHA-512
d937984e4556ab009a1c03f8a45fdf5141f10fb4fa24ee54478bb2f40dee313a77605df62c16aa738cc7adb583d356dcf5aa765172631b585f516165e7353dbb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Stockholm Resilience Centre
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 346 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf