Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Predator-hunting success and prey vulnerability: quantifying the spatial scale over which lethal and non-lethal effects of predation occur
University of St. Andrews, School of Biology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology. Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution.
University of Oxford, Department of Zoology.
2010 (English)In: Journal of Animal Ecology, ISSN 0021-8790, E-ISSN 1365-2656, ISSN 0021-8790, Vol. 79, no 3, 556-562 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

1. The shape of the function linking predator-attack success rate with distance to predator-concealing cover, or prey refuge, will affect population dynamics, distribution patterns and community trophic structure. Theory predicts that predator-attack success should decline exponentially with distance from predator-concealing cover, resulting in a threshold distance value above which there is little change in risk. Animals should then completely avoid areas of otherwise suitable habitat below this threshold, except when starvation risk exceeds predation risk.

2. We measured the shape of the function linking attack success with distance from cover in a system of Eurasian Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus attacking (n = 445) and killing (n = 71) Redshanks Tringa totanus. We then determined if there was a threshold value and whether redshanks avoided areas below this threshold.

3. Sparrowhawk success rate with distance to predator-concealing cover declined exponentially with a threshold value of approximately 30 m. Redshanks used habitat above the threshold according to profitability and only fed below it, on average, in cold weather when starvation risk can be imminently high. Above about 5°C, 26% of available habitat was avoided.

4. Our data support the hypothesis that predators create discrete areas with respect to cover that are avoided by prey. Large areas of suitable habitat may be unused, except in times of high starvation risk, when such areas may provide a foraging reserve, with large implications for population distribution and dynamics.

5. Our results are generated from a system in which predators attack their prey from concealing cover. But in the theoretically identical reverse scenario where the prey animal’s distance from protective cover determines predation risk, such non-lethal effects will be equally important, especially in heavily fragmented landscapes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 79, no 3, 556-562 p.
Keyword [en]
cover, hunting success, predation risk, refuge, trait-mediated interactions
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-48275DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01671.xOAI: diva2:383486
Available from: 2011-01-05 Created: 2010-12-06 Last updated: 2011-01-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lind, Johan
By organisation
Department of ZoologyCentre for the Study of Cultural Evolution
In the same journal
Journal of Animal Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 70 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link