Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Spelling Behavio(u)r: A Corpus-based Study of University Students' Preferred Variety of English
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of English.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Traditionally, British English has been considered the norm for EFL teaching in Europe (Trudgill & Hannah, 1994:1); however, recent studies in the Swedish context have indicated a shift towards an increasing preference for American English (e.g. Modiano & Söderlund, 2002). The present quantitative corpus-based study investigates whether Swedish university students of English show a preference for British English or American English in terms of spelling, as well as to what extent they are consistent in their choice. The Stockholm University Student English Corpus (SUSEC), compiled in 2007, comprising essays from students of English linguistics and literature from four student levels (first through fourth semester), was examined and then compared to the student essays from the Swedish subcorpus of the International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE), compiled in the 1990s. The results of the Swedish subcorpora were subsequently compared to the results of the Bulgarian and Italian subcorpora of the ICLE to gain a broader perspective on preference and degree of consistency outside of Sweden.

The results showed a clear preference for British English spelling for all the investigated subcorpora. There was no statistically significant difference between the different student levels of the SUSEC, nor was there any statistically significant difference between the SUSEC and the Swedish subcorpora of ICLE (SWICLE); the preference seemed therefore not to have changed notably over the years separating the SWICLE from the SUSEC. When comparing the findings from the Swedish subcorpora to the Bulgarian and Italian data, an even stronger preference for British English was found in the Italian subcorpus, whereas the Bulgarian subcorpus showed no statistically significant difference compared to the Swedish results. In terms of consistency, the students were generally consistent in their use of one variety, although the results from the SUSEC showed a slightly higher incidence of inconsistent essays compared to the Bulgarian and Italian subcorpora; the difference between the SUSEC and the SWICLE was not statistically significant. There was, furthermore, no significant difference between the different student levels within the SUSEC. These findings could provide a basis for further studies on how advanced EFL learners actually use the language, and add to the discussion of which variety – or varieties – should be taught in schools (Levin, 2002:59).

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , p. 31
Keywords [en]
Advanced EFL learners, British English, American English, spelling, consistency
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-52379OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-52379DiVA, id: diva2:387263
Presentation
2011-01-12, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, 10:05 (English)
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2011-08-18 Created: 2011-01-13 Last updated: 2018-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, Tove
By organisation
Department of English
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 509 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf