Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Too young or too old: Evaluating cosmogenic exposure dating based on an analysis of compiled boulder exposure ages
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.
2011 (English)In: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, ISSN 0012-821X, E-ISSN 1385-013X, Vol. 302, no 1-2, 71-80 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cosmogenic exposure dating has greatly enhanced our ability to define glacial chronologies spanning several global cold periods, and glacial boulder exposure ages are now routinely used to constrain deglaciation ages. However, exposure dating involves assumptions about the geological history of the sample that are difficult to test and yet may have a profound effect on the inferred age. Two principal geological factors yield erroneous inferred ages: exposure prior to glaciation (yielding exposure ages that are too old) and incomplete exposure due to post-depositional shielding (yielding exposure ages that are too young). Here we show that incomplete exposure is more important than prior exposure, using datasets of glacial boulder 10Be exposure ages from theTibetan Plateau (1420 boulders), Northern Hemisphere palaeo-ice sheets (631 boulders), and present-day glaciers (208 boulders). No boulders from present-day glaciers and few boulders from the palaeo-ice sheets have exposure ages significantly older than independently known deglaciation ages, indicating that prior exposure is of limited significance. Further, while a simple post-depositional landform degradation model can predict the exposure age distribution of boulders from the Tibetan Plateau, a prior exposure model fails, indicating that incomplete exposure is important. The large global dataset demonstrates that, in the absence of other evidence, glacial boulder exposure ages should be viewed as minimum limiting deglaciation ages.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 302, no 1-2, 71-80 p.
Keyword [en]
cosmogenic nuclides, exposure age interpretation, prior exposure, incomplete exposure, glacial chronology, deglaciation
National Category
Physical Geography Geology
Research subject
Physical Geography; Quarternary Geology
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-53245DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.040ISI: 000287555800007OAI: diva2:390270
Available from: 2011-01-24 Created: 2011-01-21 Last updated: 2012-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1491 kB)1327 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1491 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
attachment(1953 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.xmlFile size 1953 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type attachmentMimetype text/xml
attachment(1453 kB)102 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT02.pdfFile size 1453 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type attachmentMimetype application/pdf
attachment(6 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT03.zipFile size 6 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type attachmentMimetype application/zip

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Heyman, JakobStroeven, Arjen P.
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology
In the same journal
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Physical GeographyGeology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1327 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 52 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link