Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Contrasting effects of transience and substrate erodibility on downstream variations in bedrock channel geometry and erosional capacity
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology (INK).
2010 (English)In: Geophysical Research Abstracts, 11, 11770, European Geosciences Union General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, May 2010., 2010Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Channel geometry directly influences the erosional capacity of rivers incising bedrock and so is key to how fluvial erosion drives landscape evolution; however, widely divergent relationships among river incision rate, channel width, and channel slope, have been observed in different settings. Based on a large empirical dataset of channel width and slope (n6000) we identify regression-based scaling relationships in four mixed bedrock-alluvial rivers in western Scotland that are subject to spatial variations in fluvial incision rate and substrate erodibility. We find that stream power per unit area (reach-averaged) increases by up to a factor of 10 downstream of actively retreating bedrock knickpoints, and that channel narrowing is the dominant mechanism for raising erosional capacity under transient conditions. By contrast when it comes to substrate erodibility we find that bedrock channel width is far less sensitive than channel slope. Resistant outcrops (quartzites) steepen bedrock channels by a factor of 1.5 to 6.0 and, in terms of stream power per unit area, channels increase their erosional capacity by a factor of 2.7 to 3.5. Yet only 4 to 13 % of this increase is due to channel narrowing. Channel width scales with discharge as W = 3.32 Qˆ0.33, irrespective of lithology. Our results are consistent with the view that W-Q scaling is similar in all single-thread rivers subject to transport-limited conditions, but for increasingly sediment supply-limited settings such as western Scotland, erosional thresholds at the channel boundary exert a strong control on bedrock channel width.

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010.
National Category
Physical Geography
Research subject
Physical Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-54243OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-54243DiVA: diva2:392413
Conference
European Geosciences Union General Assembly
Available from: 2011-02-03 Created: 2011-01-26 Last updated: 2011-02-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(37 kB)73 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 37 kBChecksum SHA-512
a34ac45943730b5f17cf80e0d6bccfcc51128512d2b0f14a22ac3ba9a69bebc0193fc0342895557d139561cbff45b652319dac3e16494e971ab873b8aa0c9a6b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jansen, John
By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology (INK)
Physical Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 73 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf