Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why did the Telia-Telenor merger fail?
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School, Management & Organisation.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6668-1190
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Business School.
2004 (English)In: International Business Review, ISSN 0969-5931, E-ISSN 1873-6149, Vol. 13, no 5, p. 573-594Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this article is to examine through a case study of the merger of Telia–Telenor why firms from apparently similar national cultures can fail to form a co-operative venture. Telia and Telenor were the largest telecom operators in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Both were government-owned with a strong monopoly over their respective national markets for a long time. Despite perceived similarities between the negotiating parties in national culture, corporate practice, and language, the negotiation eventually went askew and the ongoing merger ended in December 1999 after only two months in existence. We describe the process of the Telia–Telenor merger negotiation and analyze it from a cross-cultural management perspective. Our major finding is that historical sentiments, feelings and emotions, if not handled well, can cause fatal damage to cross-cultural business ventures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 13, no 5, p. 573-594
Keywords [en]
Telia, Telenor, Merger negotiation, History, Culture
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-56390DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.06.002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-56390DiVA, id: diva2:410926
Note

Corrigendum: doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.09.006

The authors intend to announce the following: Norway had been a province of Denmark but not Sweden and the Norwegian Constitution was adopted on May 17, 1814. Detailed description of the Sweden–Norway Union (1814–1905) can be sourced via a recent project conducted jointly by Swedish and Norwegian researchers http://www.nb.no/baser/1905

Available from: 2011-04-15 Created: 2011-04-15 Last updated: 2022-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Fang, Tony

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fang, Tony
By organisation
Management & OrganisationStockholm Business School
In the same journal
International Business Review
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 490 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf