Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Steps towards constructing a global comparative risk analysis for alcohol consumption:: Determining Indicators and Empirical Weights for Patterns of Drinking, Deciding about Theoretical Minimum, and Dealing with Different Consequences
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD).
Show others and affiliations
2001 (English)In: European Addiction Research, ISSN 1022-6877, E-ISSN 1421-9891, Vol. 7, no 3, 138-147 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In order to conduct a comparative risk analysis for alcohol within the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD 2000), several questions had to be answered. (1) What are the appropriate dimensions for alcohol consumption and how can they be categorized? The average volume of alcohol and patterns of drinking were selected as dimensions. Both dimensions could be looked upon as continuous but were categorized for practical purposes. The average volume of drinking was categorized into the following categories: abstention; drinking 1 (>0–19.99 g pure alcohol daily for females, >0–39.99 g for males); drinking 2 (20–39.99 g for females, 40–59.99 g for males), and drinking 3 (≥40 g for females, ≥60 g for males). Patterns of drinking were categorized into four levels of detrimental impact based on an optimal scaling analysis of key informant ratings. (2) What is the theoretical minimum for both dimensions? A pattern of regular light drinking (at most 1 drink every day) was selected as theoretical minimum for established market economies for all people above age 45. For all other regions and age groups, the theoretical minimum was set to zero. Potential problems and uncertainties with this selection are discussed. (3) What are the health outcomes for alcohol and how do they relate to the dimensions? Overall, more than 60 disease conditions were identified as being related to alcohol consumption. Most chronic conditions seem to be related to volume only (exceptions are coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke), and most acute conditions seem to be related to volume and patterns. In addition, using methodology based on aggregate data, patterns were relevant for attributing harms for men but not women.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 7, no 3, 138-147 p.
Keyword [en]
Alcohol, Burden of disease, Beneficial effect, Risk factor, Global, Methodology, Average consumption, Patterns of drinking
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
Social Work
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-56794DOI: 10.1159/000050731ISI: 000170528000006OAI: diva2:413121
Available from: 2011-04-27 Created: 2011-04-27 Last updated: 2015-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Room, Robin
By organisation
Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD)
In the same journal
European Addiction Research
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 18 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link