Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Promoting Innovation?: A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Application of Article 101 TFEU to Patent Technology Transfer Agreements
Stockholm University, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study examines the degree to which the application of Article 101(1) Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) to patent technology transfer licensing agreements considers and promotes innovation. The study presents a new view on the patent-antitrust intersection, by exploring the competition law assessment of licensing agreements in light of the economic concept of innovation, licensing efficiency and transactional hazards.

The survey of the academic literature on patent licensing agreements suggests two points. Firstly, innovation cannot be equated to the invention protected by a patent right but includes the commercialization of the end-product. Licensing is a necessity in the innovation process, in particular, because of the patent holder’s lack of complementary assets. In addition, the effects of licensing on dynamic competition include also the impact on follow-up innovation. Secondly, licensing creates transactional hazards. A competition law assessment of licenses that promotes innovation must therefore adequately take into account the transactional hazards for both parties (licensing efficiency) when balancing market rivalry and dynamic competition.

The analysis of Article 101 TFEU suggests that the Commission has adopted a broad view on innovation. Transactional hazards and effects on follow-up innovation are taken into account to a certain degree. The rules are also found to incorporate an effects-based analysis which has the result that transactional hazards are given less weight in the balance with the protection of market rivalry. Competition law may therefore prohibit agreements that pertain to resolve transactional hazards that arguably increase dynamic efficiency because of the presence of market power. The study therefore suggests that the assessment of justifications of restrictive clauses under competition law should focus less on market power and more on licensing efficiency.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Department of Law, Stockholm University , 2011. , 640 p.
Keyword [en]
technology transfer, competition law, patent, licensing, law and economics, innovation
National Category
Law
Research subject
Legal Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-63031ISBN: 978-91-7447-389-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-63031DiVA: diva2:447368
Public defence
2011-11-15, De Geersalen, Geovetenskapens hus, Svante Arrhenius väg 14, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2011-10-24 Created: 2011-10-07 Last updated: 2011-10-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bastidas Venegas, Vladimir
By organisation
Department of Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2289 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf