Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Addict to win?: A different approach to doping
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Philosophy.
2010 (English)In: Journal of Medical Ethics, ISSN 0306-6800, E-ISSN 1473-4257, Vol. 36, no 11, 700-707 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Traditionally the doping debate has been dominated by those who want to see doping forbidden (the prohibitionist view) and those who want to see it permitted (the ban abolitionist view). In this article, the authors analyse a third position starting from the assertion that doping use is a symptom of the paradigm of highly competitive elite sports, in the same way as addictions reflect current social paradigms in wider society. Based upon a conceptual distinction between occasional use, habitual use and addiction, and focusing on the physical and/or mental dependency caused by the addictive use of a certain drug, we argue that marihuana, stimulants and anabolic steroid abuse-the most frequently detected substances in doping tests-satisfies at least one, often both, of these conditions. A conclusion to be drawn from the authors' arguments is that the prohibitionist view is inappropriate for dealing with doping, as the severe sanctions attached to it will cut the doper off her/his social and professional environment, thereby risking reinforcing her/his addictive conduct. But the ban abolitionist view seems inappropriate as well. At first sight, it seems neither rational nor humane not to intervene when confronted with conduct which is highly harmful for the individual and upon which she has reduced or no control whatsoever. Instead the authors' proposal will be to contextualise dopers' conduct within sport healthcare and see it strictly in relation to each athlete's personal background. Developing preventive programmes-implemented through person-tailored counselling and eventually treatment, rather than severe sanctions or the mere lifting of the ban-seems to be a more reasonable, and probably more efficient, way of conducting 'the war against doping'.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 36, no 11, 700-707 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-66223DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.034801ISI: 000285189300014OAI: diva2:467673
authorCount :2Available from: 2011-12-19 Created: 2011-12-19 Last updated: 2011-12-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tamburrini, Claudio
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
In the same journal
Journal of Medical Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 78 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link